Contact FutureLearn for Support
Skip main navigation
We use cookies to give you a better experience, if that’s ok you can close this message and carry on browsing. For more info read our cookies policy.
We use cookies to give you a better experience. Carry on browsing if you're happy with this, or read our cookies policy for more information.

Playing with fMRI data

Correctly used, the PartitionMembership filter doesn’t help at all. The best we have been able to do with this dataset is 65.9% accuracy, with SMO.

There’s probably not much more you can do with Weka alone. To do better, you might have to go back to the data, and consult a specialist in MRI for brain studies. For example, we noted above that Haxby repeated the procedure 12 times for each subject. The NIFTI_Files dataset amalgamates these 12 runs: perhaps it would be better to treat each one separately? Also, Haxby had 12 subjects and we have only used the data for one of them: perhaps they should be combined – but how? Or maybe we should be looking at a different region of the brain – different voxels.

One important message of the Data Mining with Weka courses is that running experiments with Weka is usually only a small part of any actual data mining application.

Share this article:

This article is from the free online course:

Advanced Data Mining with Weka

The University of Waikato

Course highlights Get a taste of this course before you join: