Young Haitiian girl with black braids and a white dress looks at the camera. Behind her is a man sitting on the ground leaning against a tree. There is a car parked behind the tree with rubble strewn around the yard.
Ashley Ager, 8, lives with her grandmother, in the settlement of Cole Bay on Sint Maarten. Her grandmother, a Dominican immigrant, cleans houses, cooks and cares for other children to earn money. She sends money to her children in the Dominican Republic.

Definitions of informal and formal alternative care

The UN Guidelines for the Alternative Care of Children tell us that alternative care arrangements are either formal or informal, and provide the following definitions:

Informal care is described as:

‘Any private arrangement provided in a family environment, whereby the child is looked after on an ongoing or indefinite basis by relatives or friends (informal kinship care) or by others in their individual capacity, at the initiative of the child, his/her parents, or another person, without this arrangement having been ordered by an administrative or judicial authority or a duly accredited body’.

Formal care is described as:

‘All care provided in a family environment which has been ordered by a competent administrative body or judicial authority, and all care provided in a residential environment, including in private facilities, whether or not as a result of administrative or judicial measures’.

A “competent authority” is a government body that has been given responsibility by the State to supervise alternative care arrangements. Sometimes it is a department in a government ministry. For example, it could be part of a Ministry of Social Welfare, Ministry of Justice, or another body. Certain functions deriving from this responsibility can also be delegated by the authorised government body to a non-governmental organisation.

Formal alternative care placements are generally designed to be temporary arrangements. An example might be children who were travelling with their parents or legal/customary caregiver but were separated from them for protection reasons. We should make every effort possible to reunite them with their carers - under safe and appropriate conditions - as soon as possible. Following intensive efforts, if reunification is still not possible, then all efforts should be made to provide a child with permanency through adoption or other sustainable measures.

Although it may be preferable to reunite a separated child with their family, reunification is not always feasible for some unaccompanied and separated children. For example, it may take a long time - or indeed never be possible - before a child can return home safely. There may also be security or safety considerations that make it undesirable for a child to return to their parental home. Indeed, the child may feel very strongly about not wanting to return home for various reasons. Because of the situation the child has left behind, family reunification might not be considered in the child’s best interests.

In the next course step we will consider what the term ‘unsuitable’ means when used in reference to alternative care.

Share this article:

This article is from the free online course:

Caring for Children Moving Alone: Protecting Unaccompanied and Separated Children

University of Strathclyde