Perspectives on evaluation
You’ve probably come across different perspectives on how to conduct an objective evaluation. Here are two perspectives:
An established perspective argues that evaluation should strive to maintain objectivity so that “the claims, methods and results of science [evaluation] are not, or should not be influenced by particular perspectives, value commitments, community bias or personal interests, to name a few relevant factors.“ (Reiss & Sprenger, 2014, para 1).
“There is no such thing as objective evaluation.”
Spend a few minutes reflecting on the two perspectives. Do you agree with one more than another? Why?
- evaluations take place within a specific context, which makes objectivity very difficult
- evaluations are limited by the knowledge and skills of the evaluators involved
- the scope of an evaluation is limited to the resources at the disposal of the evaluators (Bergmann, 2010, p.23)
Is there such a thing as objective evaluation? Relate the answer to your own experience and share.
Bergman, M. M. (2010). Evaluation methods and processes : tensions between expectations, resources and competencies. LeGes, 21 (1), 23-31.
Reiss, J. & Sprenger, J. (2014). Scientific Objectivity. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The Metaphysics Research Lab and Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI), Stanford University. (If you are interested in a detailed philosophical argument around objectivity in evaluation.)
© UNSW Sydney 2017