Contact FutureLearn for Support
Skip main navigation
We use cookies to give you a better experience, if that’s ok you can close this message and carry on browsing. For more info read our cookies policy.
We use cookies to give you a better experience. Carry on browsing if you're happy with this, or read our cookies policy for more information.
Pie chart with one slice represented as a cake

The economic cake: What size will the slice be?

We have identified that inequality is harmful for economic growth and if we cannot alter this inequality the well-being of the next generation may well be affected.

You will recall in week 1 that we introduced the economic cake analogy (representing GDP), living standards and the concept of labour productivity.

So what is the size of the slice we’ll get from this economic cake, to secure our well-being?

In saying that inequality is harmful for economic growth, we are saying that it reduces our ability to create a bigger economic cake. Put simply, dividing up the cake into more unequal shares can actually make it more difficult to increase the size of the cake for everyone. This implies that more inequality hurts the improvement in living standards.

In terms of our equation: , labour productivity (Y/L) is lower which implies lower output per capita (Y/N), that is, each person on average gets a smaller slice of economic cake.

What does this mean for our next generation? We may be passing on a smaller slice of cake to them than we thought.

In the next step, we will see what gets passed down through the generations and whether the next generation is empowered to change the inequality they are handed.

Your task

Share your thoughts about this article in the comments section below.


Share this article:

This article is from the free online course:

Exploring Economics: Will the Next Generation Be Worse Off?

Griffith University