Contact FutureLearn for Support
Skip main navigation
We use cookies to give you a better experience, if that’s ok you can close this message and carry on browsing. For more info read our cookies policy.
We use cookies to give you a better experience. Carry on browsing if you're happy with this, or read our cookies policy for more information.

Skip to 0 minutes and 10 secondsBy now, we had a look at optimisation and equilibrium models. We learned about bottom up and top down, social planners, firms, consumers, and marketing direction. An actual question at this point is 'which approach should you choose for your model'?

Skip to 0 minutes and 29 secondsAnd the natural answer to that question is: it depends. The most important driver for your model design is your actual research question. If you are looking for a quantification of potential future developments for a specific region or country, you will more likely end up with an energy system type model than if you want to understand how different policy designs impact investment incentives.

Skip to 1 minute and 1 secondWhen trying to translate your problem into a model, first figure out where your main focus is. Your interest helps you to decide if you need whether a conceptual model or if you should use a numerical modelling approach, or even both. Maybe you are more interested in the economic understanding of your problem and would like to research topics like optimal policy design or incentive structures. In this case, you should probably focus on a more conceptual modelling approach. The building blocks you learned will be helpful for a place to start.

Skip to 1 minute and 42 secondsIf you want to provide quantification for potential developments, figure out the optimal level of a renewable support scheme, or simply derive a good price estimation for next year's electricity markets, you will likely need a data-intensive numerical model. The energy system logic of optimisation models will be a good place to start. Similar, you can try to differentiate by the size of your model. Are you looking at a single actor, like firms? Then again, the building blocks will be a good start. Are you more concerned about actors interaction and and market dynamics, an equilibrium setting could be a valid approach.

Skip to 2 minutes and 27 secondsAnd if you are thinking about large energy systems with plenty of details that you need to account for, again, an optimisation with lots of side constraints could be a good solution. Luckily, many questions can be tackled with different model approaches and still produce the same results.

Skip to 2 minutes and 49 secondsWhether you use an equilibrium model to simulate the perfect competitive energy market or an optimisation model maximising total welfare, if both have the same underlying data, they should also produce the same outcome. Often, both model types can be transferred into each other and are thereby equally fitted for your model. Only when you have more than one value you would like to optimise but can't simply add them up into a single object, you are bound to equilibrium approaches-- well, at least most of the time.

Which model type to choose?

By now you have learned about system perspectives and how to build optimization models, and practiced with your first bottom-up energy system model. You followed the explanation of basic building blocks and learned how to design aggregated firm and market models. So the natural question you likely ask at this point is: which is the best model type to choose for a specific problem?

There is no general answer to this question as it heavily depends on the problem you want to analyze. One advantage of modeling is that many roads lead to Rome. In many cases you will be able to address your problem with different model types.

If you focus on the main characteristics of the different model concepts and designs we discussed, you often get a good idea for which type of question they are well fitted.

For example, think about the scale of your question:

  • Large scale energy system models often focus on capturing many technical bottom-up aspects.
  • Firm-oriented models allow you to capture the behaviour of profit oriented companies and how their decisions are influenced by external aspects like prices or policy regulations.
  • And market models focus on interaction of actors.

Or whether you are looking for qualitative or quantitative answers:

  • Conceptual/theoretical models aim to understand mechanisms and arguments.
  • Numerical models can provide scenario assessments and are fitted to represent specific real world markets or systems.

Or, how your mathematical formulation fits to your question:

  • Optimization problems need something to optimize like profits or costs.
  • Equilibrium problems capture the interaction of different actors.

With a bit of experience those considerations will become easier and a natural part of the back and forth between defining your research problem and designing your model.

Share this video:

This video is from the free online course:

Exploring Possible Futures: Modeling in Environmental and Energy Economics

University of Basel