Putting ideas into practice.
How do we play the long game?
Gender and development initiatives have a long history. One of the major points of contentions and debate in this work is how it might be possible to effect real change while also attending to the immediate and urgent needs of women and communities.
Achieving gender equity involves confronting power, law, norms, economics, government, culture and more. So how is it possible to plan for change across all these areas while also working with women in their communities? How does development ‘play the long game’ - driving systemic change in the face of urgency?
Feminists, activists, and gender and development workers are constantly engaged in creating new and more relevant approaches to such planning.
Frameworks for the Long Game
‘Gender Analysis’ is a planning framework that has produced a range of tools for assisting local, national and global organisations to analyse the most effective, context-relevant types of interventions.
One of the most original and enduring of these approaches is one devised by gender and development scholar Caroline Moser. In her approach it is necessary to devise interventions and approaches to meet both, what Moser terms, practical and strategic gender needs.
We’ve heard all these different approaches from WuDunn and Kristof, who promote giving to charities and NGOs as a path to ending gender inequity, through to Moser who promotes the longer, more strategic approach. It is not easy to translate any of these frameworks or approaches into successful outcomes.
Thinking about these tensions what do you think are some workable solutions. What would you suggest as first steps? What would the barriers be to these steps being successful? How would they contribute to the long game?
Moser, C 1989, ‘Gender planning in the Third World: meeting practical and strategic gender needs’, World Development, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 1799 - 1825, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305750X89902015.
© Deakin University