Skip main navigation
We use cookies to give you a better experience, if that’s ok you can close this message and carry on browsing. For more info read our cookies policy.
We use cookies to give you a better experience. Carry on browsing if you're happy with this, or read our cookies policy for more information.

Summary and reflection

What did you learn this week?

In week 2 you looked at, read about and discussed some basic principles for teaching and their application through a variety of teaching strategies in different teaching modes. In the videos you heard from teaching staff about their approaches and strategies and pondered the question,’What’s worth learning?’ posed by David Perkins.

This week you have looked at, read about and discussed some basic principles for teaching and their application through a variety of teaching strategies in different teaching modes.

It was interesting to see that in rating the characteristics of a good teacher many of you chose ‘share the love of the subject ‘ as number 1 or 2 in your lists and mentioned that these described your favourite teachers. There were also strong relationships between the characteristics you chose and your ‘good’ learning experiences mentioned in week 1.

In the discussions on teaching approaches many of you talked about using a mix of transmission and student-centred approaches, with some of you identifying the transmission approach as the dominant approach in your teaching context.

David Perkin’s question about ‘What’s worth learning?’ inspired some discussion about how much of what (content) we teach is a waste of time. There was some agreement with the claim alongside some nice points made about ‘what’ we teach being a vehicle for the development of ‘how’ we teach students to learn and to think. A few people challenged the claim that it’s not necessarily what we teach but some of our teaching approaches (how) we teach that’s problematic.

In Strategies for effective tutorials Tim’s perspective on the role of the tutor as both learner and teacher sparked some discussion on how to find a balance in this approach. On the one hand some people mentioned wanting to create a safe space for students to learn and feel comfortable in making mistakes. There was some consensus on some of the points Tim made, including being prepared to be both a teacher and a learner in the tutorial context and aiming to make students feel confident and willing to participate. How can you go about achieving this with your students?

Some of you provided strategies for improving interaction and engagement in Making lectures more effective and engaging including peer to peer teaching and learning and breaking up long lectures into smaller chunks through the use of quick quizzes, questions, polling and case studies.

Thank you to all those that contributed to the discussions this week. In week 3 we turn the focus to assessment and feedback.

Share this article:

This article is from the free online course:

Introduction to Learning and Teaching in Higher Education

UNSW Sydney

Contact FutureLearn for Support