Mobile phones are probably the most common source for non-ionizing radiation.© G. Tjalvin
These days, most people have a mobile phone. The phone is a source for non-ionizing electromagnetic fields, but the exposure levels are very low. The exposure levels were much higher for the first mobile phones on the market, and their development over the years has led to a great improvement regarding radiation dose. There has been a huge on-going discussion about the possible health effects of mobile phones. The risk of cancer has been discussed among experts many times. The conclusion today is that we do not consider the exposure to non-ionizing electromagnetic fields to be a cause of cancer.
Sign indicating risk of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation © Colourbox
Very strong low frequency electric fields (> 10 kVolt/m) and powerful magnetic fields (>1000-10000 microTesla) can induce currents in the human bodies electric nervous system, these currents can be powerful enough to cause nerve and muscle activation leading to involuntary muscle contractions.
Non-ionizing electromagnetic fields, also known as non-ionizing radiation, contain energy which is deposited in the tissues. Heating due to this deposition is strongly connected to the frequency of, and power of the field and the volume and electromagnetic properties of the tissue which is being radiated. When this heating occurs it can lead to cellular and tissue burns depending on the degree of heating, damage to the retina and genotoxic damage to the cells. Heating is seen occur when the energy deposit exceeds 4 Watts/kilogram, which often gives a temperature increase of 1 degree Celsius.
Brain cancer caused by cellular phones
As mentioned earlier, there have been discussions on the possibility of a relationship between non-ionizing radiation from mobile phones and the development of cancer, In 2011, The WHO/International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B), based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer, associated with wireless phone use.
You can read details on this topic here: “IARC Monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of humans, Volume 102, 2013. Non-Ionizing Radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields”
This conclusion is quite confusing, but we think it is important to note that the conclusion is based upon the exposure to mobile phones, not to exposure to non-ionizing electromagnetic fields. Earlier, the exposure from mobile phones was quite different than today. The exposure from mobiles 20 years ago was quite high compared with the levels of the phones we have today. The possible cancer risk related to mobile phone use is not likely to be present today. It is also important to know that several major reviews on non-ionizing electromagnetic fields and health have been published and all their conclusions are the same: There is no consistent evidence for any adverse health effect from exposure to non-ionizing electromagnetic fields below the thermal exposure limit.
It is not as easy to shield from exposures to non-ionizing radiation as it is regarding ionizing radiation. Lead shielding has no effect on this type of non-ionizing radiation. However, the guidelines concerning distance to source are very important. The radiation decreases when the distance increases.
© University of Bergen/Authors: O.J. Møllerløkken, B.E. Moen