Want to keep learning?

This content is taken from the University of Basel & Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences 's online course, Partnering for Change: Link Research to Societal Challenges. Join the course to learn more.

Skip to 0 minutes and 9 secondsFrom a theoretical point of view,

Skip to 0 minutes and 11 secondstransdisciplinary projects are split in three distinct phases: the phases of 'problem framing', 'jointly conducting research', and 'exploring the impact'. During the coming weeks, I'll guide you through these project phases and introduce the major tasks, challenges, and milestones of each. Whenever I introduce a further step of this theoretical approach, I'll refer to this scheme. It summarises the major phases of a transdisciplinary project and illustrates the exchange between key players of signs in practice. You'll find a PDF with this complex process attached below. If you like, please take some time to carefully recapitulate each of these steps by yourself. The first phase of a transdisciplinary project is about jointly envisaging a project and framing goals, problems, and research.

Skip to 1 minute and 10 secondsOr in short, the first phase consists in 'problem framing'.

Skip to 1 minute and 17 secondsThe main task of the first phase is to jointly frame the transdisciplinary project.

Skip to 1 minute and 23 secondsKey challenges are: to identify relevant understandings of the problem situation, to clarify who to involve, to match societal knowledge, demand, and research questions, and to define achievable project goals. Transdisciplinary research projects typically start with a topic. Compared to a research question, a topic is not yet defined. This figure shows several such topics. For instance, poverty, disease, land degradation, or starvation. In contrast to disciplinary research, transdisciplinary research starts with acknowledging that a topic is complex and that there are manifold ways to address it. For example, this figure illustrates the different perspectives on the problem field of 'starvation'. A company might have business ideas about how to address starvation, whereas a governmental agency might think about a food programme.

Skip to 2 minutes and 31 secondsAn ethical investigation might ask questions about the just distribution of resources among the living, whereas an economic investigation of starvation might look at economic drivers. It is key to make the different understandings explicit and known to all participants. The question of who to involve includes considerations about expertise, power, and interest. A transdisciplinary project has to bring together the expertise needed for a comprehensive understanding and management of an issue. Furthermore, if a transdisciplinary project wants to make a difference, those affected by it in a negative or positive way have to be included as well as those who have the power to make a change. Involve does not automatically mean that they are physically present in the project.

Skip to 3 minutes and 29 secondsThink, for instance, of a project addressing illegal tropical timber export. The people illegally harvesting and exporting wood would probably not be present in the project meetings. Still, as a relevant stakeholder, they have to be taken into account. A tool often used to clarify who to involve is a stakeholder analysis.

Skip to 3 minutes and 54 secondsAnother key challenge is to clarify the contributions a transdisciplinary research project can make to the societal issue at stake. Addressing this challenge means to specify how exactly scientific knowledge production will be linked to the societal problem. A further challenge is to clarify the project goals from the perspective of those involved. Transdisciplinary projects might end in frustrations, because goals and how achievable they are within the frame of a project were not discussed beforehand. A tool for such discussions are the outcome spaces. The tool asks those involved to clarify what project outcomes they expect. Such outcomes might concern the situation on the ground, the knowledge on it, or learning processes among the participants and beyond.

Skip to 4 minutes and 56 secondsAt the end of the first phase of problem framing,

Skip to 4 minutes and 59 secondsthere is, ideally: a shared problem that is socially relevant and scientifically interesting, a team of researchers of different disciplines and actors of different sectors of society willing to work on it, clarity about the group members' different ways to frame the problem, and finally, a set of achievable project goals.

Phase 1: problem framing

From a theoretical point of view, transdisciplinary projects are split in three distinct phases: The phases of ‘Problem framing’, ‘Jointly conducting research’, and ‘Exploring the impact’. During the coming weeks, Christian Pohl will guide you through these project phases and introduce the major tasks, challenges, and milestones of each.

The first phase of a transdisciplinary project includes, amongst others, defining the societal problem to work on, the researchers and further actors to be involved, and clarifying the roles and responsibilities. Some of the major challenges in the first phase of a transdisciplinary project are named.

Can you identify this first phase and associated tasks or challenges in your own transdisciplinary projects? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.

Educator: Dr. Christian Pohl

Share this video:

This video is from the free online course:

Partnering for Change: Link Research to Societal Challenges

University of Basel