Skip to 0 minutes and 5 seconds DRAGANA MLADENOVIC: Archaeologists study material remains of the past, from the earliest periods, when human ancestors started altering their environment or using objects, up until very recent times. So some colleagues study industrial remains from the last couple of centuries. And it sits somewhere at the intersection between humanities and sciences. Humanities, because of course, the central focus of archaeology is the humankind. But also because archaeology has always– archaeological theory in particular– has always borrowed from the current cultural climate, from the intellectual context in which it was developing, particularly when it comes to its interpretive framework. On the other hand, in its field work method, archaeology has always used scientific methods, particularly from earth sciences.
Skip to 0 minutes and 56 seconds So it really sits somewhere at the intersection of these two. In its early years, archaeology was very much bound to history. It was historical sources like the near Eastern list of kings. Or classical authors or the Bible, that were used to both interpret archaeological discoveries but also to guide them. Just think of Schliemann, looking for Troy and excavating Hisarlik by using Homer’s account of the Trojan war. It took quite a long time for archaeology to step out of that shadow and it really came through when it started using very scientific disciplines.
Skip to 1 minute and 39 seconds So for example, stratigraphy, which archaeology took over from geology, a method through which we interpret superimposed layers in their relative chronological sequence, was one of the first times when archaeology could at least relatively date something without having to rely on a text. But the real breakthrough, the point when archaeology really came into its own, was an introduction of another scientific technique, and that is carbon-14 dating. Happening throughout the 1950s, it is a method that allows us to date anything that is organic completely independently. So for the first time, archaeology could date prehistory. Prehistory is the period of human past for which we have no written records. And it actually is the largest section of the human past.
Skip to 2 minutes and 32 seconds There are also other periods which are within a historical period in some regions, but we have no written record of. And for the first time, with the invention of absolute dating, archaeology became completely independent.
What archaeologists study
Dragana made several points relating to dating in the video. Dating is crucial for archaeology and we distinguish between two kinds of dating: relative and absolute. A relative chronology involves placing events in the relative sequence in which they took place (A happened before B, B before C etc.). Absolute dating provides not only a sequence of events but also a precise information when something took place (in which year or century, depending on the material one is working with).
Relative dating methods have been used in archaeology almost from its beginnings. They include stratigraphy (observing the sequence in which archaeological layers formed, about which you will learn more in week four) and typology of finds (systematic ordering of artefacts based on common attributes such as material, shape and decoration in order to determine the sequence in which they developed; this information is used to determine the sequence of contexts that these objects came from).
The only way to obtain an absolute calendar date in those days is to obtain it from one of the ancient sources. While this might have worked to an extent for Classical Antiquity or Egypt, the majority of past cultures had no comparable evidence to work from, and their chronologies were just floating sequences without any fixed points.
This changes after 1950s when due to several scientific breakthroughs methods were devised that allowed for precise absolute dating of archaeological material. These are mostly physical residue analysis of certain elements or properties for which we can reconstruct the original quantity or quality. For example the Radiocarbon dating that I mention dates organic materials based on how much Carbon 14 isotope is left in an organic material in its present state, while knowing how quickly that isotope breaks down and how much an organism would have originally contained. There are several other scientific methods working on a similar principle.
Please post any questions below, and also comments and links that can help others to learn about archaeology as a multidisciplinary endeavour.
The next video will go through the different scientific expertise that we use at Portus. There are then a video and two articles dealing with specific examples – the study of seeds, animal bones, and written materials. Please post your own thoughts on where archaeology sits in the humanities-sciences spectrum, and indeed whether you think it matters!
© University of Southampton