Skip main navigation
We use cookies to give you a better experience, if that’s ok you can close this message and carry on browsing. For more info read our cookies policy.
We use cookies to give you a better experience. Carry on browsing if you're happy with this, or read our cookies policy for more information.

Skip to 0 minutes and 5 secondsSIMON KEAY: I know you come from a classics background. So how do you think all of this archaeological view of the Roman Mediterranean, how is that making you think about the Roman Empire?

Skip to 0 minutes and 18 secondsMEAGHAN CARLEY: Well, as you said, we have all kinds of physical evidence for that. And sort of a span of their civilisation, which I never really grasped before. You said North Africa, Asia Minor, Spain. And I think it really speaks to a sort of globalisation, which is something that I think we often forget they did first.

Globalisation?

You will have gathered that Meaghan thinks that the material culture demonstrates the span of the Roman civilisation and in turn suggest a sort of “globalisation” in the early first millennium.

Meaghan is using the term “globalisation” to express a sense of similarity - she doesn’t literally equate the Roman past with a contemporary concept. This is an important distinction.


Discussion topic:

To what extent can we apply a concept like “globalisation” to the Roman world? Please add your thoughts in the comments section below.


Share this video:

This video is from the free online course:

Archaeology of Portus: Exploring the Lost Harbour of Ancient Rome

University of Southampton

Get a taste of this course

Find out what this course is like by previewing some of the course steps before you join:

Contact FutureLearn for Support