Skip main navigation
We use cookies to give you a better experience, if that’s ok you can close this message and carry on browsing. For more info read our cookies policy.
We use cookies to give you a better experience. Carry on browsing if you're happy with this, or read our cookies policy for more information.

Skip to 0 minutes and 12 secondsThe herbicide glyphosate, widely used on genetically modified organism crops in the form of Roundup, has been reported as the safest herbicide in history, so safe you can drink it, less toxic than aspirin. But these statements can be seen as representative of a particular worldview in which a human body is understood as independent from the more-than-human bacteria that break down food in the gut and shape human life. Glyphosate's mode of action affects the Shikimate pathway, a metabolic route particular to bacteria, fungi, parasites, plants, and algae, a route that is not biologically a feature of human bodies, which contributes to the belief that glyphosate is not harmful to humans.

Skip to 1 minute and 3 secondsHowever, in 2015, the World Health Organisation changed its position on glyphosate and reported that it is probably carcinogenic. The conflicting perceptions of the safety of glyphosate highlights how different imaginaries create a different sense of what is safe through contrasting perceptions of how humans and environments, including gut micro-biota, interact. The term imaginary refers to the different values, symbols, practises, and institutions, that different groups of people share. The sense of safety of glyphosate varies and is hotly contested.

Skip to 1 minute and 45 secondsIt depends on the imaginaries of different stakeholder groups, such as Monsanto-- the major producer of glyphosate herbicides-- scientists researching glyphosate-- who might receive funding from chemical manufacturers-- farm workers who have lymphoma, a form of cancer that they attribute to glyphosate, regulators, consumers, and anti-GMO activists. Environmental health concerns raised by glyphosate use also point towards how events, such as a cancer diagnosis, and other ways of living, are not discovered, but are actively created due to our different imaginaries and practises. Our imaginaries and practises are a form of worlding. This term worlding is used within Environmental Humanities and a range of other fields, including philosophy, digital humanities, cultural geography, and aesthetics, to acknowledge that different entities and relations emerge in different settings.

Skip to 2 minutes and 51 secondsTo quote Donna Haraway-- "Technology is not neutral. We're inside of what we make, and it's inside of us. We're living in a world of connections-- and it matters which ones get made and unmade." There are a range of ways in which to understand, address, and ultimately engage in practises of worlding. In my art practise and research, I stage public art experiments and explore public articulations of toxic bodies— how toxins are digested, archived, and excavated, both materially and discursively, influenced by different practises of worlding.

Skip to 3 minutes and 30 secondsFor example, in my artwork, “The Suburban Lawn: A 2-Hour Museum,” staged at the artist-run initiative "Serial Space” in Sydney, I included a museum display imagining a post-lawn world— a seed swap, artist talks, and wild food foraging event, led by the artist Diego Bonetto. The purpose of the project was to provoke discussion on how our suburbs might function if pesticide-soaked, grassy lawns were made to recede, and backyards turned into more productive sites, such as urban farms. Research, as a practise of worlding, involves learning how to register subtle differences, to attune oneself to other entities-- as Donna Haraway might put it, to become curious about and obligated to humans and non-human others. It is an ethical practise.

Skip to 4 minutes and 22 secondsOn ethics, Karen Barad writes, it is “not about the right response to a radically exterior/ized other, but about responsibility and accountability for the lively relationalities of becoming, of which we are a part." Therefore, art interventions and other forms of research, as forms of worlding, are not merely a way of engaging with environmental concerns— by offering critiques or simply providing representations of the concerns— but rather, allow for engagement with ecological issues through tending to uncertainties and learning to be affected by what emerges. It is an opportunity to ask and enact what is healthy, what is safe, and for whom? An opportunity to cultivate an ethos for becoming curious, obligated, and responsible in specific situations.

Re-making and re-worlding

In the previous step, Deb and Thom introduced the idea that stories have the power bring us into new connections, and therefore new accountabilities and obligations. In this video, Susie Pratt builds on this notion with a discussion of “worlding.”

This video reflects the idea of “worlds” as realms where particular relationships between humans, non-humans and other environmental elements come into being.

As Susie explains, different worlds and imaginaries — perceived connections between entities such as humans and gut microbes — emerge in different settings. “Worlding” is a concept used within Environmental Humanities and a range of other fields which acknowledges that our understandings of the world are made and re-made through encounters between different imaginaries.

In the video, Susie introduces worlding through a discussion of growing concerns over the herbicide glyphosate, which is widely used on Genetically Modified Organism crops in the form of Roundup. In this example, different stakeholder groups hold different imaginaries about the health impacts of glyphosate because of subtle differences in the way they understand human health.

Susie explains that art interventions and other forms of research — as forms of worlding — can envision new worlds that demonstrate greater ethics of care and concern, and can potentially open up more responsible imaginaries and ways of knowing.

Susie’s project gets at worlding materially, through the design of art exhibits and installations. In the next step, you will play the Game of Global Futures, which is another form of worlding.

References

Share this video:

This video is from the free online course:

Environmental Humanities: Remaking Nature

UNSW Sydney

Get a taste of this course

Find out what this course is like by previewing some of the course steps before you join:

  • What is nature?
    What is nature?
    video

    In this video, Thom van Dooren explains why the conceptual framework of nature was never a good way of understanding the world around us.

  • Implication 2: nature and power
    Implication 2: nature and power
    video

    In this video, Deborah Bird Rose describes how notions of the nature-culture division are intricately entangled with power in the form of colonisation

  • Liveliness of things
    Liveliness of things
    video

    In this video, Stephen Muecke and Thom van Dooren discuss the liveliness and agency of the non-human world.

  • How to play the Game of Global Futures
    How to play the Game of Global Futures
    video

    In this video, Eben Kirksey and Karin Bolender introduce The Game of Global Futures.

  • Mode 1: justice
    Mode 1: justice
    video

    In this video, Paul Munro and Susie Pratt discuss environmental justice as a mode of restorying.

Contact FutureLearn for Support