Judicial resilience
When analyzing the adoption of algorithmic tools in court systems, we find that their use is influenced by the type of government, the judiciary’s progressiveness, and public trust in AI. A pivotal element in this realm is “judicial resilience,” which means the judiciary’s capacity to integrate new tech without compromising core legal principles.
In the AI era, understanding this resilience becomes crucial, especially when considering the impact of algorithmic tools.
We need to determine:
- Do these tools support or replace judges?
- How much authority is given to these algorithms?
- Do algorithmic decisions touch upon core societal values?
- What effect do these decisions have on a defendant’s rights and responsibilities?
Algorithmic tools in the judiciary present both opportunities and challenges. While they can enhance a judge’s ability to deliver detailed, data-driven decisions, they can also make the justification of those decisions more intricate. In this discussion, our aim isn’t to dictate regulations or prohibitions regarding these tools. Instead, we should introspect on our foundational values within the judiciary, determine how algorithms can fortify and advance these values, and identify uses that should be sidestepped to safeguard essential rights.
Reach your personal and professional goals
Unlock access to hundreds of expert online courses and degrees from top universities and educators to gain accredited qualifications and professional CV-building certificates.
Join over 18 million learners to launch, switch or build upon your career, all at your own pace, across a wide range of topic areas.
