Harassment can make men desperate and depressed. ^{© Colourbox}

Definition of harassment – case illustration

Paul, a department leader, 38 years old, tells us his story:

“I have been in our company for nine years. I have been the leader of the department the last five years. I have really enjoyed the work, and I think that my colleagues and I have been able to do a good job. At least, our department has been alright economically – there have been no red figures; in fact we have had an increase in production over this period. However, last year, it was decided that our department should merge with another department, as our company bought a smaller one of the same type. It was decided that Mr. Smith, from our top leadership, should be the manager of both these departments. In this new organization, I should continue in my work as before, but report to Mr. Smith, not to Mr. Joombala who is the top manager and who I used to report to earlier. The merger was put in action about seven months ago. From this time a number of horrible experiences started to happen to me. The first thing was one day when I came to work; I found my office was empty. One of the secretaries was upset and said that some person in the transport had moved my things to another office, three stores higher up in the building. I walked around and found the place and my things were there. I called Mr. Smith, but he was out and did not respond. I had to start working, as I had several meetings and a busy schedule, and was not able to talk to Smith until two days later. At that time he informed me that a business associate from another country should stay in our company for eight months and he had decided that it was better if this guest had my office. He said that he had understood that I was much out at work sites and did not need to have an office close to the department. I expressed some concern about the change, but the decision had been made. Then, one day I came back to the department around lunchtime and found everyone else gathered in the meeting room. They had just held a department meeting without me. The meeting had been led by Mr. Smith, and he had not informed me about the meeting. This is just an example of the kind of things I have not been informed about. There have been many changes and meetings have been held without my knowledge. Today, when I arrived in my office, my computer was gone. Mr. Smith had decided that I did not need one; he had given it to someone else, and tells me I can use a computer in the office of one of the secretaries. But I find that I work better when I can sit down in a quiet office to write my reports. I do not know what to do.”

Definition of harassment

Harassment (or bullying) is a special negative treatment experienced over time. Harassment among adults is a bit different than harassment found among children. This lecture concerns adults only. Examples of harassment can, for instance be about being given assignments at work below your level of competence, withholding of information or neglecting to include your opinions, as in the situation Paul experienced, or other actions which can make it difficult for a worker to perform his work.

Harassment can be defined in a number of ways. In most settings it is common to include in the definition of harassment, that the negative acts must have been taken place for more than six months. Also, it is often included in the definition that the person(s) exposed to harassment will have problems defending themselves. This is usually because the person (or people) on one side of the situation is perceived as having more power than the harassed one, either formally or informally. It does not always mean than a superior is harassing a subordinate, even though this is common. Also colleagues at the same level as yourself or subordinates can harass you, but informal structures can make a defense from it difficult. The harassing colleague can, for instance, be important in the performance of your leader’s work, which will make problems for you. However, normally we do not call conflict situations ‘harassment’ if two equally strong parties are in conflict with each other, or if it is a single episode.

Be aware that it is important to know that harassment can be defined differently in different countries. Some harassed employees have brought their situation due to harassment at work to court trials. To be able to do this, legislation must be in place which states that harassment is not acceptable at a work place, and there must be a definition of harassment in the legislation.

Such a definition is needed as there are specific problems related to the subjectivness of the situation. A worker may feel harassed while the persecutor might not always know that his or her acts are experienced as harassment by others. For instance, at some work places there might be a culture where some of the workers have a habit of giving out rather tough comments to other persons. Examples like “Move your fat ass, Johnson!” or “What is the problem this time, can you never do things right?” can be comments given with a laughter. However, the people on the receiving end may not find the comments funny at all, especially when they hear them every day for years.

Some countries state that we have a harassment situation if the worker himself/herself feels that he/she is harassed. Other countries require witnesses or documentation to confirm the harassment situation; the feeling is not enough. Some persons have been able to be compensated after a harassment situation by winning a court trial, but not many. However, when the country has a clear legislation on the issue and the harassment is obvious, the worker may have a strong case from a legal point of view.

The diseases that may develop from the harassment are seldom evaluated as “occupational diseases”. This is due to political issues. Sadly, policy makers often think more about the risk of payment to many workers affected by this type of problem than about the possibility of preventing the issue. Bringing such cases forward for the public is important to shed light on the problem, and transparency is important to be able to reduce and prevent this type of behaviour. Paul, in the story at the beginning of this session was clearly harassed at work.

ILO is concerned about harassment, see here: Harassment

Sexual harassment

Sexual harassment is defined in the literature as “unwanted sexual attention” or “unwanted sexual advances”. This may happen at some workplaces. Most often, verbal comments are a problem, but a more serious issue is that many experience “attempt to stroke and fondle you” and, perhaps even worse, the workers may experience to be treated better after providing sexual cooperation with the perpetrator.

You can find an ILO-report on Sexual harassment in the world of work here: Sexual harassment

Whistle blowers do an important task. ^{© Colourbox}

Whistleblowing

Whistleblowing include incidents where the employee brings attention to unacceptable work conditions at a workplace, that the employee has themselves experienced or witnessed at the workplace; incidents that are in conflict with national guidelines and regualtions, company regulations or general perception of what is safe or ethically acceptable. In some definitions whistleblowing is defined as giving information about unacceptable conditions not directly related to the whistle-blower him or herself. Other definitions would include cases that the whistle-blower is a part of, such as harassment. The whistleblowing should be directed towards persons or institutions that have a capability to intervene in the matter, in ultimate instances the press. It is however, important to follow company guidelines when such exist. In some cases, the whistle-blower can be subject to harassment, as a kind of punishment both from management and other colleagues. ILO has special ethical office procedures for use in such cases. This is because the whistle-blowers may need specific protection, but also to ensure the rights of the accused official are also considered, ensuring the fairness and transparency of the whole procedure. It is especially important in such a sensitive situation to strictly follow the rules of justice and due process.

Whistleblower protection