Skip main navigation

New offer! Get 30% off one whole year of Unlimited learning. Subscribe for just £249.99 £174.99. New subscribers only. T&Cs apply

Find out more

Bibliography

This step includes a list of references cited in the MOOC.
Page from a book containing several bibliographical references.
© Neil Hughes
  • Ashraf, M.A., Yang, M., Zhang, Y., Denden, M., Tlili, A., Liu, J., Huang, R., & Burgos, D. A., (2021) Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews on Blended Learning: Trends, Gaps and Future Directions. Psychol Res Behav Manag. Oct(14), 1525-1541.
  • Alexander, R. (2009) Towards a Comparative Pedagogy. In: Cowen, R., Kazamias, A.M. (eds) International Handbook of Comparative Education, New York: Springer International Handbooks of Education.
  • Baudrillard, J., (1993) Symbolic exchange and death. London: Sage Publications.
  • Biggs. J. (2003) Teaching for Quality Learning at University – What the Student Does 2nd Edition SRHE / Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Bitzer, L., (1968) The Rhetorical Situation, Philosophy & Rhetoric, 1(3).
  • Bloom, B. S. (1956) Taxonomy of educational objectives; the classification of educational goals, New York: Longmans, Green.
  • Bowen, R. S. (2017) Understanding by Design. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. Available at https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/understanding-by-design/ (Accessed: 10.01.2023).
  • Bower, M., & Vlachopoulos, P. (2018) A critical analysis of technology-enhanced learning design frameworks, British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(6), 981-997.
  • Garrison, D.R., Vaughan, N.D. (2008) Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles and Guidelines, New York: Wiley.
  • Hughes, N. (2021) Romantic Online Course Design. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkh3-T7qwwY (Accessed: 18.01.2022).
  • Hughes, N. (2023) Student engagement, pedagogical imaginaries and the future of arts and humanities teaching and learning in higher education. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 22(1), 81–99.
  • Heidegger, M. (1977) The Question Concerning Technology: And Other Essays, New York and London: Garland Publishing. *Huprich, J. (2019) Building Learner Personas for Instructional Design Effectiveness. Available at https://medium.com/@juliahuprich/building-learner-personas-for-instructional-design-effectiveness-8787d4e5d1d2 (Accessed: 20.11.2022).
  • Ihde, D. (1993) Philosophy of Technology: An Introduction, New York, Paragon House.
  • Jaspers, K. (1951) Man in the Modern Age, London: Routledge.
  • Joosten, T., Weber, N., Baker, M., Schletzbaum, A. and McGuire, A., (2021) Planning for a Blended Future: A Research-Driven Guide for Educators. Every Learner Everywhere Network.
  • Koper, R., & Olivier, B. (2004) Representing the learning design of units of learning, Educational Technology and Society, 7(3), 97-111.
  • Laurillard, D. (2002) Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies. London: Routledge.
  • Laurillard, D. (2012) Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. London: Routledge.
  • McGee, P., & Reis, A. (2012) Blended course design: A synthesis of best practices. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16, 7–22.
  • Muszynski, J. (2013) The designer-illustrator: The 1950s hybrid, Fashion Institute of Technology, State University of New York ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
  • Newcombe, P. (2018) Is the Future of Higher Education Learning “Blended”: Using Technology to Enhance the Learning Experience 3rd International Conference on Educational Management and Administration, Malang, Indonesia, 06-07 October, Amsterdam, Netherlands: Atlantis Press.
  • Peters, D. (2014) Interface Design for Learning. San Francisco: New Riders.
  • Selwyn, N. (2017) Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates, 2nd Ed., New York: Bloomsbury. *Sobe, N. W., & Kowalczyk, J. (2012) The Problem of Context in Comparative Education Research, Journal of Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies, 6(6).
  • Taleb, N.N. (2007) The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable, New York: Random House.
  • Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998) Understanding by Design, Alexandria Virginia, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
© University of Notingham
This article is from the free online

Blended and Hybrid Learning Design in Higher Education

Created by
FutureLearn - Learning For Life

Reach your personal and professional goals

Unlock access to hundreds of expert online courses and degrees from top universities and educators to gain accredited qualifications and professional CV-building certificates.

Join over 18 million learners to launch, switch or build upon your career, all at your own pace, across a wide range of topic areas.

Start Learning now