Skip main navigation

Exploring delay discourses

You will explore issues that relate to common categories of delay discourses.
In previous steps, we saw that statements about the climate crisis in the media, on social media, and in many other places are often inaccurate, incomplete, or misleading. You also learned about delay discourses. These are arguments or claims that acknowledge climate change but discourage urgent or meaningful action through misleading arguments (Lamb et al., 2020).  

In this step, we’ll take a closer look at common categories of delay discourses, identifying how they work and considering ways to counter them constructively. To make this more tangible and fun, each discourse category is represented by an illustration based on the artwork of Léonard Chemineau.

Launch the exercise.

Please note, by selecting this link you will be taken to a page containing content provided by a third party website.

Share your experiences 

Now that you have explored the discourses of climate delay, reflect on any encounters you’ve had with these delay discourses, whether in media, social media, public debates, or personal conversations and consider: 
  • What was the context? 
  • Which type of discourse did you encounter, and what was the main claim? 
Share your experience in the Comments section, along with any counterarguments you used, or would consider using now. 

This article is from the free online

Climate Action: Tackling the Climate Crisis for a Better World

Created by
FutureLearn - Learning For Life

Reach your personal and professional goals

Unlock access to hundreds of expert online courses and degrees from top universities and educators to gain accredited qualifications and professional CV-building certificates.

Join over 18 million learners to launch, switch or build upon your career, all at your own pace, across a wide range of topic areas.

Start Learning now