Skip main navigation

‘Newer’ methods of procurement

Over the last 20 years or so, clients have experimented with a number of ‘newer’ procurement methods
© Coventry University. CC BY-NC 4.0
Over the last 20 years or so, clients have experimented with a number of ‘newer’ procurement methods available, including those listed in the Designing buildings wiki.
As well as routes from that extensive list of ‘newer’ procurement routes, there have been a number of government-sponsored procurement initiatives. For example, the most recent ‘newer’ methods of procurement in the UK have been outlined in two government documents:
Central government recommendations in New models of construction procurement.
Local government recommendations are included in National construction category strategy 2018 and deemed applicable for the next five years.
To influence where your independent research into newer procurement trends should be focused, consider the table below, which has been taken from the NBS National Construction Contracts and Law Report 2018, which evaluated responses from UK construction industry participants into procurement methods used on projects:
The procurement method frequency graph shows traditional procurement at 46%, design and build at 41%, partnering or alliancing at 3%, construcion management at 3%, contractor approved without any tender process at 2%, measured term at 1%, private finance initiative (PFI)/public private partnership (PPP) at 1%, cost plus at 1%, and management contracting at 1%
*The procurement method frequency graph is also available in the ‘downloads’ section below
As we can see from the graph, traditional procurement and design and build procurement are still the most popular choices by a long way.
You can obtain information on newer procurement routes from the publication Building and construction procurement guide principles and options by concentrating on pages 21-33.

Your task

Discuss why you think there are so many procurement route choices available and why there seems to be a lack of longevity for newer procurement routes?
Is this good for construction’s image or does it reinforce the image that construction project professionals cannot really guarantee that a project will be completed on time, within budget and deliver to the required quality and function?

References

NBS (2018) ‘National Construction Contracts and Law Report 2018’. [online]. available from https://www.thenbs.com/knowledge/national-construction-contracts-and-law-report-2018 [6 June 2018]
© Coventry University. CC BY-NC 4.0
This article is from the free online

Construction Project Management: An Introduction

Created by
FutureLearn - Learning For Life

Our purpose is to transform access to education.

We offer a diverse selection of courses from leading universities and cultural institutions from around the world. These are delivered one step at a time, and are accessible on mobile, tablet and desktop, so you can fit learning around your life.

We believe learning should be an enjoyable, social experience, so our courses offer the opportunity to discuss what you’re learning with others as you go, helping you make fresh discoveries and form new ideas.
You can unlock new opportunities with unlimited access to hundreds of online short courses for a year by subscribing to our Unlimited package. Build your knowledge with top universities and organisations.

Learn more about how FutureLearn is transforming access to education