We use cookies to give you a better experience. Carry on browsing if you're happy with this, or read our cookies policy for more information.

Skip main navigation

Summary and Discussion of quadratic relations

This is a brief summary of this week's activities, and an opportunity for discussion.
Diagram of parabolic mirror showing light rays as arrows
© UNSW Australia 2015
Here is a brief summary of this week.

Summary of quadratic relations

We began with a historical overview of how the ancient Greeks thought about conic sections, and some of the many properties they discovered about ellipses, parabolas and hyperbolas. Descartes realised that algebraically these were exactly the second degree equations in \(\normalsize{x}\) and \(\normalsize{y}\). In particular we had a good look at the parabola and its properties, since this is the geometrical curve that corresponds to a general quadratic function of the form \(\normalsize{y=ax^2+bx+c}\).
Then we studied a variety of quadratic relations, including area, kinetic energy, motion of a ball thrown vertically and trajectories of projectiles, along with applications in economics.
The algebraic side of quadratic equations centres on the remarkable identity of al Khwarizmi obtained by completing the square, and the associated celebrated quadratic formula. This allows us to understand zeroes of quadratics, and connects with Descartes theorem on factors.
The shape and position of a general quadratic was looked at. Hopefully you have a good sense of how to analyse a given quadratic function, say something like \(\normalsize{y=2x^2-3x+7}\). We were able to exploit this algebraic understanding to find vertices, evaluate maxima and minima of such curves, and even to obtain formulas for secant and tangent lines, all without any calculus.
We saw how parabolas figure prominently in modern design and architecture, including the Sydney Harbour bridge, along with the remarkable de Casteljau Bezier curves. These were based on the interesting idea of specifying curves by parameters, and we started by examining how to parametrise line segments, and then quadratic curves, and had some pictures of cubic curves too.
And we looked at the algebraic problem of fitting a quadratic function to three specified points, which touched base with the useful technique of solving a system of three equations in three unknowns, going back to the ancient Chinese. We have covered a lot of territory, well done!

Discussion

This is an opportunity to make comments and ask questions of a general nature about this week’s material. Then there is a test, and then on to Week 3 and inverse relations, where the hyperbola takes the lead role.
Activity image credits: “Conic sections” © Magister Mathematicae/Wikimedia Commons CC BY SA 3.0; “Circular Paraboloid” © Sam Derbyshire/Wikimedia Commons CC BY SA 3.0; “Thermometer with Fahrenheit and Celsius” Public Domain/Wikimedia Commons; “Discussion” © Muhammad Rafizeldi/Wikimedia Commons CC BY SA
© UNSW Australia 2015
This article is from the free online

Maths for Humans: Linear, Quadratic & Inverse Relations

Created by
FutureLearn - Learning For Life

Our purpose is to transform access to education.

We offer a diverse selection of courses from leading universities and cultural institutions from around the world. These are delivered one step at a time, and are accessible on mobile, tablet and desktop, so you can fit learning around your life.

We believe learning should be an enjoyable, social experience, so our courses offer the opportunity to discuss what you’re learning with others as you go, helping you make fresh discoveries and form new ideas.
You can unlock new opportunities with unlimited access to hundreds of online short courses for a year by subscribing to our Unlimited package. Build your knowledge with top universities and organisations.

Learn more about how FutureLearn is transforming access to education