Skip main navigation

Cubic curves II: cubic functions and their graphs

In this video Norman Wildberger discusses cubic curves and cubic functions, as well as their equations and graphs.
In the linear and the quadratic situations, we saw that a general linear function, or a general quadratic function, could be obtained from y equals x, or y equals x squared, by scaling and translating appropriately. You might think the same is true for a cubic function, that we could take our basic cubic function, y equals x cubed, and just scale it and translate it, and we would get a general cubic. But it’s not quite so simple in the cubic world. A general cubic actually has quite a different shape from this special y equals x cubed cubic. This is more typical of the shape of a cubic. It’s still very pleasant and regular.
It’s still actually very important in design issues, like with Bezier curves, but it’s given by a more general equation. Here’s the general form for a cubic function, y equals a x cubed plus b x squared plus cx plus d. So there’s four variables that can be introduced there, four degrees of freedom. When we’re studying a cubic function like this, one of the most important questions is, does it have 0’s and if so, where are they? If there are 0’s, as in this case, alpha, beta, gamma– that means x-intercepts– then by Descartes, we can rewrite the cubic, or try to at least, in the form a times x minus alpha, x minus beta, x minus gamma.
So each of these 0’s contributes a linear factor to the expression of the cubic. It’s important to realise though that the world of cubic functions actually extends beyond these particular forms. Now you may remember that when we were talking about quadratics, that quadratic functions geometrically always turned out to be parabolas. But in fact, second degree curves, more generally, also included ellipses and hyperbolas. So similarly, in the cubic situation, if we move to more general cubics that are given by arbitrary polynomials in x and y of degree 3, then we get a wide variety of other kinds of curves not just ones that look like this. So cubic analogues of ellipses and hyperbolas, whatever that might be.
Newton and other 17th century mathematicians were very interested in these new kinds of cubics that they could study and explore using this Cartesian framework. For example, Fermat, one of the founders of the subject, studied x cubed plus y cubed equals 1, kind of a cubic catalogue of the unit circle. And he determined that it has a shape, something like this.
That’s the Fermat curve, x cubed plus y cubed equals 1.
In this video we discuss cubic curves and cubic functions.

General cubic functions

The general cubic function has the form \(\normalsize{y=ax^3+bx^2+cx+d}\) and has a somewhat different shape to the standard cubic \(\normalsize{y=ax^3}\). We discuss the general form of such functions, and the relation with any zeroes it might have: there are at most three zeroes, but a general cubic need not have all three zeroes, even approximately.

More general cubic curves

Isaac Newton investigated more general cubic curves, given by arbitrary degree-three polynomials in \(\normalsize{x}\) and \(\normalsize{y}\). Earlier, both Fermat and Descartes had investigated special cubics. The theory of these kinds of curves is rich and full of surprises.

Zeroes and coefficients

The zeroes of a polynomial, if they are known, and the coefficients of that polynomial are two different sets of numbers that have interesting relations. If we know the zeroes, then we can write down algebraic expressions for the coefficients. Going the other way is much harder and cannot be done in general. But in special cases, it can be done.
Q1 (M): What is the factorisation of \(\normalsize{f(x)=x^3+2x^2-5x-6}\)?
One trick that is useful is that if we have a monic cubic (meaning that the coefficient of the highest order term is 1), such as
\[\Large{f(x)= x^3-5x^2-29x+105}\]
and it does factor into integer factors, say
then by expanding this out we must have that
\[\Large{a+b+c=5}\] \[\Large{ab+bc+ac=-29}\] \[\Large{abc=-105}.\]
In particular if \(\normalsize{a}\), \(\normalsize{b}\), \(\normalsize{c}\) are integers and we want to solve for them, we should try various numbers that are factors of \(\normalsize{105}\), including negative integers. So we might try \(\normalsize{3,5,7,15,21,35}\) and their negatives. In fact it is the case that \(\normalsize{-105 = 3 \times (-5) \times 7}\), and
\[\Large{f(x)= x^3-5x^2-29x+105=(x-3)(x+5)(x-7)}.\]
Hopefully this hint should make finding the factorisation in Q1 easier.


A1. The factorisation is
This article is from the free online

Maths for Humans: Inverse Relations and Power Laws

Created by
FutureLearn - Learning For Life

Our purpose is to transform access to education.

We offer a diverse selection of courses from leading universities and cultural institutions from around the world. These are delivered one step at a time, and are accessible on mobile, tablet and desktop, so you can fit learning around your life.

We believe learning should be an enjoyable, social experience, so our courses offer the opportunity to discuss what you’re learning with others as you go, helping you make fresh discoveries and form new ideas.
You can unlock new opportunities with unlimited access to hundreds of online short courses for a year by subscribing to our Unlimited package. Build your knowledge with top universities and organisations.

Learn more about how FutureLearn is transforming access to education