Skip main navigation

Important legal provisions on sentencing (continued)

Article on legal provisions on sentencing.
Legal papers
You might recall from the animation of Joe’s sentencing that an important driver for what sentence a judge will impose is the seriousness of the offence. Seriousness is referred to in section 143 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and its key dimensions relate to:

  • The culpability of the offender – how blameworthy they are. So, where A kills B intentionally, that is more blameworthy than if A kills B carelessly, or accidentally

  • The harm caused by the offence, or which was intended to be caused, or which might foreseeably have been caused

So, a sentencing judge has some pretty broad brush principles to work with. They are also constrained by the maximum sentence available for a given offence.

If that was all there was to it, then you might reasonably be concerned that sentencing could be a bit random. But, while judges do have, in general, a fair amount of discretion in relation to sentencing, that discretion is structured. The broad brush statements of principle which we have encountered so far are supplemented by Sentencing Guidelines, applicable to specific offences, and to which judges refer when making sentencing decisions for those offences.

We will return to these Guidelines in a future step.

© University of York
This article is from the free online

From Crime to Punishment: an Introduction to Criminal Justice

Created by
FutureLearn - Learning For Life

Reach your personal and professional goals

Unlock access to hundreds of expert online courses and degrees from top universities and educators to gain accredited qualifications and professional CV-building certificates.

Join over 18 million learners to launch, switch or build upon your career, all at your own pace, across a wide range of topic areas.

Start Learning now