In this article, Dr. Diane Hamilton introduces the four major factors that impede or diminish quality of curiosity in humans, FATE.
Beyond any physical or health-related factors that can dampen our curiosity, such as stress, dementia, or drugs, research leads to four major factors that impede or diminish this quality in humans.
I’ve labeled these factors FATE (fear, assumptions, technology, and environment).
Based on testing, fear is the most predominant factor that influences our curiosity. It may be fear of the unknown, fear of what we might find, fear of the uncomfortable, or fear that the results of our exploration might challenge our current beliefs.
Fears are sometimes disguised as false bravado or ego. Fear of failure tends to be major. How many times have we threatened to quit our jobs or wanted to start a business fearing what will happen if it doesn’t work out?
Our curiosity rarely gets the chance to explore the options of a new job or how to start a new business before the dreaded “yeah, buts” shut it down. Our fear overtakes our courage and curiosity.
The desire to try something new or different is fruitful only when our determination or motivation to explore further or learn more mitigates the risks we feel anxious about.
The more curious we are, the more we come to know. The more we know, the less fearful we become. The inverse of that is also true. The less we know, the more fearful we are and the less we come to know.
How does fear inhibit your curiosity?
Assumptions (the way things have always been done)
Another common reason we become averse to trying something new, or even wondering about it, is that we get comfortable doing things the way we’ve always done them, or we consider the issue already solved. If we assume something already works, why explore something new or different?
In the business world, for example, speed is a virtue, and innovation is risky and expensive. Therefore, it’s common for leaders to push for a fast and safe solution rather than a new, untried one.
One of the biggest paradoxes in industry today consists of holding on to tried-and-true solutions yet yearning for innovation. We might tell ourselves that we don’t have time to exercise our curiosity and explore new ideas. However, as the world progresses and becomes more innovative, those who don’t proactively seek new information won’t keep pace. It’s important to reward people for exploring new ideas and asking questions.
In our personal lives, we might select jobs based on what we assume is expected of us. Perhaps people in our family have always been engineers, lawyers, doctors, and the like. Therefore, we might think that we should pursue the same kind of path. Perhaps we tell ourselves that we must be good at a particular career or a certain line of work because that’s what our lineage did.
Traditionally, we gravitate to the assumption that “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.” However, the pace of innovation and entrepreneurship today suggests a new version of that expression: “If it ain’t broke, break it!” Then, fix it and make it better than it was before.
What assumptions do you hold that might be preventing curiosity and innovation?
The third major factor that affects our curiosity is technology.
Technology has offered us so many answers and made it so much easier to access those answers, yet as generations become more and more technology dependent, curiosity can actually be squelched. If computers can answer our questions, we may not see the need to discover the why behind those answers.
So, technology can, in fact, dissuade us from learning new things. If learning something requires first trying out technology to discover answers, people can feel overwhelmed. For example, those who want to learn more about writing but have little knowledge about computers and online documents might be stymied. Thus, they might not pursue their writing interest due to the sheer number of steps required.
Then there’s artificial intelligence (AI). As it becomes more popular, we’ll have more devices doing more things for us, requiring us to do less. Scientists have reminded us that the more we’re given answers, the less likely we are to ask questions.
Thus, we have another of the paradoxes regarding curiosity as it relates to the emergence of technology: how do we sustain our desire to ask questions in a world more and more dominated by answers?
Can you look past answers to find more questions that may lead to breakthroughs?
Parental, family, teacher, and peer influence (our environment)
The fourth major category of factors that tend to suppress our curiosity is the environment in which we live or were raised. Social pressures can stifle our instincts to be curious.
Our families and friends might inadvertently put ideas in our heads that something isn’t appropriate or is even bad because they fear the unknown. Sometimes having a friend join you in a curious endeavor can help alleviate that tendency to judge.
Social media have caused a lot of people to share only things that will be “liked” by other people. They might subconsciously worry that showing interest in something other than what everyone else has interest in will make them look bad.
Regarding education, it’s a widely held belief that children are born curious and become discouraged in school. Sir Ken Robinson’s widely popular TED talk
(as mentioned in Week 2
) asks the question: Do Schools Kill Creativity? 
As we age, we’re told to act certain ways, which can inhibit curiosity and creativity. Learning environments can have a dampening effect. Teachers might inadvertently confine students to the curriculum, stifling a natural form of curiosity that might lead in a completely different direction. Researchers have even found that curiosity can be diminished if opposite-sex siblings occupy the same room.
Younger generations have begun to feel even more pressure to conform than other generations. Research indicates that Millennials are the most stressed-out generation. They lack risk tolerance when it comes to financial decisions and have less distress tolerance in the workplace. Because they worry about what others think of them more than other generations do, they’re less likely to propose new ideas and speak up in meetings.
The lessons we learn from our parents, teachers, professors, and bosses are the same lessons that can stifle our curiosity later in life.
Were you taught only answers or also taught to question?
Boundless research on curiosity assures us that we are born with it, and it serves to acclimate us to the world around us.
We know that our curiosity leads to better performance and creativity and is essential to motivation and innovation. Curiosity is seen by entrepreneurs and business leaders around the world as making the fundamental difference between being good and being excellent. It’s a key difference between surviving and thriving and between mediocre employees and outstanding employees.
To know how to instill curiosity, we must first know what gets in the way. We do know several factors that tend to curtail our curiosity, ranging from mental or physical impairments to laziness. We’ve added more clarity and specifics regarding those inhibiting factors of FATE.
In the following chapters, we’ll explore the barriers within each of those four categories and how companies can remove them to unleash the potential of their workforce, which is our ultimate goal.
I researched thousands of people over many years to determine the factors that inhibit curiosity. One of the best articles on curiosity was published in HBR from Harvard researcher, Francesca Gino. In her article
she shares some insight regarding the case for curiosity. I was fortunate to have her join me on my show
where we got into collaboration.
How does curiosity improve collaboration?
Share your thoughts in the comments section below!
References1. Robinson S. Do schools kill creativity? [Internet]. Ted.com. 2006 [cited 11 September 2020]. Available from: https://www.ted.com/talks/sir_ken_robinson_do_schools_kill_creativity?language=en