Site visibility
The visibility of a site – the way in which it appears on an image – will affect the way in which it is interpreted, and the site understood. Image interpretation is the process of using our knowledge to make decisions about what features we can see in an image, and what these might mean. There are two main factors that determine this. Let us learn about these now.
Image properties
Satellite images are “rasters”, made up of a continuous grid of cells (or “pixels”), each with a value. There is a second course coming soon that will explore the technical details of image properties in more depth. For now though, you need to know that the type and quality of an image affects what we can see in it (Fig 1). Last week we noted that the angle at which the image was taken (vertical or oblique) and the position of the sun (and therefore shadows) shape the properties of the image (Fig 2).
Fig 1: The Early Bronze Age cemetery of Halban, Oman in two different Google Earth images. Note that the same sites appear more clearly in the picture on the left; quality of image influences interpretation. Images © 2021 Maxar Technologies. (Click to expand)
Fig 2: The angle of sun’s rays and the resulting shadow determine image quality. (Click to expand)
Environmental properties
Environmental factors affect the visibility of archaeological sites. Key factors include:
Soils, geology and geomorphology
Soils and local geology has a part to play in what we see in an image. The tone/hue of a feature will vary according to soil moisture – drier soils are lighter in hue. This can make some archaeological features more visible (Fig 3). Textures are also significant; some “rubbly” surfaces can be difficult to interpret (Fig 4). Some scholars have tried to identify soils with an “archaeological signature”, generally as a way of automating their detection. However, there is still a lot of work to be done before this can be applied as a standard method.
Fig 3: Differences in soil colour can make some archaeological features more prominent. (Click to expand)
Fig 4: The iron age village near Rustaq, Oman is difficult to spot in the Google Earth image due to the rubbly local geology. Image ©2021 Maxar Technologies. (Click to expand)
Seasonality and vegetation cover
Landscapes change over the year. We can see this in differences in vegetation, and in the amount of water in the soil (soil moisture) (Fig 5). Vegetation can obscure or highlight archaeological sites, for example along the coastal zone of North Africa (Fig 6). Sometimes we can see cropmarks, caused by crops growing at different rates due to the underlying archaeology (Fig 7). Some archaeological features become easier to see at certain times of the year (Fig 8).
Fig 5: Seasonal differences apparent at Anjar, a UNESCO World Heritage Site in Lebanon as seen on Google Earth. Image ©2021 CNET/Airbus)
Fig 6: Obscuring trees around Cyrene, Libya as seen on Google Earth. Image © 2017 DigitalGlobe
Fig 7: Cropmarks arising from vegetation
Fig 8: The visibility, appearance and surface area of semi-submerged sites in Lake Hamrin, Iraq varies significantly between summer and winter (Sentinel-2 imagery courtesy of the ESA). (Click to expand)
Land cover
The nature of the land cover (e.g. forest, wetlands) affects the kinds of features that we can see (Fig 9). The related term “land use” refers to the way in which humans use a particular area of land. Both of these affect the preservation, visibility and ease of interpretation of archaeological sites.
Fig 9: USGS land cover classification. (Click to expand)
Cloud cover
Most satellite sensors cannot penetrate (basically, see through) clouds. If there are a lot of clouds in an image, it might mean that we cannot see the land surface clearly. Partial cloud cover may obscure parts of the land surface; complete cloud cover makes it impossible to see anything at all! Clouds can appear anywhere, but the extent to which cloud cover is likely to be a problem depends on the region of the world in which you are interested and the time of the year when your images were taken (Fig 10).
Fig 10: Clouds can obscure features on the ground as seen on this image on Google Earth. In mountains or coastal locations, this is more common. Image © Landsat/Copernicus. (Click to expand)
Endangered Archaeology: Using Remote Sensing to Protect Cultural Heritage
Endangered Archaeology: Using Remote Sensing to Protect Cultural Heritage
Register to receive updates
-
Create an account to receive our newsletter, course recommendations and promotions.
Register for free







