Over the past 10 years or so, more and more researchers have been analysing burned bone. We’ve realised that despite the significant problems that such heat-induced changes introduce to the identification process, the changes themselves can be useful to investigate. We now have a range of new methods for exploring these changes, many of which focus on the microstructure of bone. This is really useful as it means we can talk about the context and circumstances of death from changes seen in the skeleton.
For example, there is a lot of interest in the use of heat-induced changes to the bone mineral structure (known as the crystallinity). This is because it has the potential to tell us something about the context of burning itself. The argument goes that bone crystallinity is directly impacted by the intensity of burning and that the conditions of burning are the key influence on the crystallinity of bone following heating. Therefore, if we can measure the crystallinity of bone after burning (which we can), we can comment on the conditions of burning themselves. This can then help us interpret the forensic context.
One of the methods I use is called Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). This is a technique that lets me examine the composition of bone. When bone is in its natural state (such as now, in you) the composition is a poorly ordered crystal structure, with small crystals and lots of space between them. As burning continues, the composition changes to a very well ordered crystal structure, with large crystals and not much space between them. The FTIR let us put a number on how far along this change the bone has progressed. So for example, low-intensity burning may cause a number of around 3, whereas high-intensity burning may cause a number of 5 or 6. The paper here gives more information on the method and outputs of this approach. (NB. To access the full text of this article and the ones below, once you’ve clicked the link, then click ‘full text’ in the side panel to the right).