Skip main navigation

‘Or’, vel, and cancellation

In this article, we see how the apparent exclusivity of 'or' is open to cancellation.
Two hands, one adult, one child, index fingers pointing towards each other
© University of York

What we’ve just seen is that we can reconcile the idea that ‘or’ has the same truth-table as vel with the sorts of judgements we make about it being wrong to say an ‘or’ sentence. The question is whether we should say that ‘or’ always has the same truth-table as vel. So far it looks like we have something of a standoff here.

One further point in favour of the constant vel interpretation of ‘or’ is that the suggestion of exclusivity is cancellable. For example, it seems to be coherent to say ‘Alex is meeting with Mattie or Alex is meeting with Sarah, and in fact Alex might be meeting with both’. Try this with the other examples. (Examples (5) and (6) aren’t cancellable, but that’s because of the meaning of the plugged-in sentences.)

© University of York
This article is from the free online

Logic: The Language of Truth

Created by
FutureLearn - Learning For Life

Our purpose is to transform access to education.

We offer a diverse selection of courses from leading universities and cultural institutions from around the world. These are delivered one step at a time, and are accessible on mobile, tablet and desktop, so you can fit learning around your life.

We believe learning should be an enjoyable, social experience, so our courses offer the opportunity to discuss what you’re learning with others as you go, helping you make fresh discoveries and form new ideas.
You can unlock new opportunities with unlimited access to hundreds of online short courses for a year by subscribing to our Unlimited package. Build your knowledge with top universities and organisations.

Learn more about how FutureLearn is transforming access to education