Skip main navigation

Resources for Week 6

References used in week 6.
Book-covered walls
© CC BY 4.0

The Role of Universities in Regional Innovation Systems, Dr. Sybille Reichert

Bacigalupo M, Kampylis P, Punie Y and Van Den Brande L. (2016): The Entrepreneurship Competence Framework. Luxembourg (Luxembourg): Publications Office of the European Union, https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/5e633083-27c8-11e6-914b-01aa75ed71a1/language-en.

LERU (League of European research Universities) (2019): Student Entrepreneurship at research-intensive universities: from a peripheral activity towards a new mainstream.

Manchester University Strategy: https://www.manchester.ac.uk/discover/vision/.

Mazzucato, Mariana (2018): The entrepreneurial state. Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths, Penguin Books.

Mazzucato, Mariana (2018a): Mission-oriented research & innovation in the European Union. A problem-solving approach to fuel innovation-led growth. Luxembourg: Publications Office.

Mazzucato, Mariana (2018b): The entrepreneurial state. Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths, Penguin Books.

Reichert, Sybille (2019): The Role of Universities in Regional Innovation Ecosystems.

Collaborative Science, Clemens Blümel

Allen, L., Jones, C., Dolby, K., Lynn, D., & Walport, M. (2009). Looking for landmarks: The role of expert review and bibliometric analysis in evaluating scientific publication outputs. PLoS ONE, 4(6), e5910. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005910.

Archambault, P. M., van de Belt, Tom H, Grajales, F. J. 3., Faber, M. J., Kuziemsky, C. E., Gagnon, S., . . . Legare, F. (2013). Wikis and collaborative writing applications in health care: A scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(10), e210. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2787.

Aversano, L., & Tortorella, M. (2011). Evaluating the Quality of Free/Open Source Systems: A Case Study. In W. van der Aalst, J. Mylopoulos, N. M. Sadeh, M. J. Shaw, C. Szyperski, J. Filipe, & J. Cordeiro (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Enterprise Information Systems (Vol. 73, pp. 119–134). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19802-1_9.

Barjak, F., & Robinson, S. (2008). International collaboration, mobility and team diversity in the life sciences: impact on research performance. Social Geography, 3(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.5194/sg-3-23-2008.

Blümel, C. (2008). Institutionelle Muster der Wissensproduktion in den Optischen Technologien: Feldtheoretische Perspektiven zur Interpretation von Netzwerkstrukturen. In C. Stegbauer (Ed.), Netzwerkforschung. Netzwerkanalyse und Netzwerktheorie: Ein neues Paradigma in den Sozialwissenschaften (pp. 131–144). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29, 627–655.

Bröer, C., Moerman, G., Wester, J. C., Rubinstein Malamud, L., Schmidt, L., Stoopendaal, A., . . . Sjølie, H. (2016). Open Online Research: Developing Software and Method for Collaborative Interpretation. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.17169/FQS-17.3.2388.

Christiansen, H., Bauer, A., Fatima, B., Goodyear, M., Lund, I. O., Zechmeister-Koss, I., & Paul, J. L. (2019). Improving Identification and Child-Focused Collaborative Care for Children of Parents With a Mental Illness in Tyrol, Austria. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 233. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00233.

Engels, T., Ossenblok, T., & Spruyt, Eric, H.J. (2012). Changing publication patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities, 2000-2009. Scientometrics, 94, 1–18.

Falk-Krzesinski, H. J., Contractor, N., Fiore, S. M., Hall, K. L., Kane, C., Keyton, J., . . . Trochim, W. (2011). Mapping a research agenda for the science of team science. Research Evaluation, 20(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211×12941371876580.

Fecher, B., & Friesike, S. (2014). Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought. In S. Bartling & S. Friesike (Eds.), Opening Science (pp. 17–47). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Fecher, B., & Wagner, G. (2016). Open Access, Innovation, and Research Infrastructure. Publications, 4(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications4020017.

Fiore, S. M. (2008). Interdisciplinarity as Teamwork. Small Group Research, 39(3), 251–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496408317797.

A Gazni (2012). Mapping world scientific collaboration: authors, institutions, and countries, 63, 323.

Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., & Schwartzman, Simon, Scott, Peter, Trow, Martin (Eds.) (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.

Guimera, R. (2005). Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance. Science, 308(5722), 697–702. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1106340.

Johannes Angermüller (2013). Doing research and evaluation. A plea for a qualitative approach to academic excellence. Retrieved from http://horizons.mruni.eu/speakers/johannes-angermuller/.

Kaufmann, A., & Tödtling, F. (2001). Science Industry interaction in the process of innovation: The importance of boundary crossing between systems. Research Policy, 30, 791–804.

Klein, J. T. [J. T.] (1990). Interdisciplinarity. History, Theory and Practice. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

Klein, J. T. & Falk-Krzesinski, H. J. (2017). Interdisciplinary and collaborative work: Framing promotion and tenure practices and policies. Research Policy, 46(6), 1055–1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.001.

Laudel, G., & Origgi, G. (2006). Introduction to a special issue on the assessment of interdisciplinary research. Research Evaluation, 15(1), 2–4.

Leimüller, G. (2017). Open Innovation Hub Universität: Vision und Herausforderung einer strategischen Neuorientierung. Zukunft und Aufgaben der Hochschulen, Rat für Forschung und Technologieentwicklung (Hg.), LIT Verlag, 401 – 420.

Lyall, C., & Fletcher, I. (2013). Experiments in interdisciplinary capacity-building: The successes and challenges of large-scale interdisciplinary investments. Science and Public Policy, 40(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs113.

Nielsen, M. (2012). Reinventing discovery: the new era of networked science, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

Ossenblok, T. L. B., & Engels, T. C. E. (2015). Edited books in the Social Sciences and Humanities: Characteristics and collaboration analysis. Scientometrics, 104(1), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1544-3.

Rip, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems and the advent of strategic science. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27, 123–131.

Sivertsen, G. (2017). Unique, but still best practice? The Research Excellence Framework (REF) from an international perspective. Palgrave Communications, 3, 17078. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.78.

Spinellis, D., Gousios, G., Karakoidas, V., Louridas, P., Adams, P. J., Samoladas, I., & Stamelos, I. (2009). Evaluating the Quality of Open Source Software. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 233, 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcs.2009.02.058.

Turner, S. (2000). What are disciplines? And how is interdisciplinarity different? In P. Weingart & N. Stehr (Eds.), Practising Interdisciplinarity. Toronto, London: University of Toronto Press.

Wagner, C. S. (2018). The Collaborative Era in Science. Springer International Publishing: Springer International Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94986-4.

Weingart, P. (2000). Interdisciplinarity: The Paradoxal Discourse. In P. Weingart & N. Stehr (Eds.), Practising Interdisciplinarity (pp. 35–41). Toronto, London: University of Toronto Press.

Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099.

© CC BY 4.0
This article is from the free online

Openness in Science and Innovation

Created by
FutureLearn - Learning For Life

Reach your personal and professional goals

Unlock access to hundreds of expert online courses and degrees from top universities and educators to gain accredited qualifications and professional CV-building certificates.

Join over 18 million learners to launch, switch or build upon your career, all at your own pace, across a wide range of topic areas.

Start Learning now