Resources of Week 2

References used in week 2.

Akbaritabar, A., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2019). Applying Crossref and Unpaywall information to identify gold, hidden, hybrid and delayed Open Access publication in the KB publication corpus. Berlin.

Archambault, E., Amyot, D., & Deschamps, P. (2014). Proportion of Open Access Papers Published in Peer-Reviewed Journals at the European and World Levels—1996–2013 (TD-B6-PP-2011-2: Study to develop a set of indicators to measure open access). Retrieved from European Commission website: http://science-metrix.com/sites/default/files/science-metrix/publications/d_1.8_sm_ec_dg-rtd_proportion_oa_1996-2013_v11p.pdf

Bogart, C., Howison, J., & Herbsleb, J. (2015). Mapping the networks of scientific software. Washington D.C.

Borgman, C. L. (2012). The conundrum of Sharing Research Data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(6), 1059–1078. Chesbrough, H. (2015). From Open Science to Open Innovation.

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (2005). Publikationsstrategien im Wandel? Ergebnisse einer Umfrage zum Publikations- und Rezeptionsverhalten unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Open Access. Bonn.

Dickel, S., & Franzen, M. (2016). The “Problem of Extension” revisited: New modes of digital participation in science. JCOM, 15(1), A06_en.

Fecher, B., & Friesike, S. (2014). Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought. In S. Bartling & S. Friesike (Eds.), Opening Science (pp. 17–47). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Fecher, B., & Wagner, G. (2016). Open Access, Innovation, and Research Infrastructure. Publications, 4(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications4020017.

Ford, E. (2013). Defining and Characterizing Open Peer Review: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 44(4), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.44-4-001.

G.E. Gorman and Professor Jennifer, Professor, & Tattersall, A. (2015). For what it’s worth – the open peer review landscape. Online Information Review, 39(5), 649–663. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-06-2015-0182.

Görögh, E., Ross-Hellauer, T., Schmidt, B., Bardi, A., Casarosa, V., Manghi, P., . . . Ruggieri, R. (2018). Deliverable D3.4- Open Peer Review: Good practices and lessons learned. Brussels.

Hagmann, D. Reflections on the Use of Social Networking Sites as an Interactive Tool for Data Dissemination in Digital Archaeology. Humanities Commons. https://doi.org/10.17613/M6V56W.

Heather Piwowar, Jason Priem, Vincent Larivière, Juan Pablo Alperin, Lisa Matthias, Bree Norlander, . . . Stefanie Haustein (2018). The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ, 6, e4375. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375.

Kitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution: Big data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and their Consequences. London: Sage.

Mayernik, M., Hart, D., Maull, K., & Weber, N. (2016). Assessing and Tracing the Outcomes and Impact of Research Infrastructures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 68(6), 1341–1359.

Nielsen, M. (2012). Reinventing discovery: the new era of networked science, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

Pisani, E., Aaby, P., Breugelmans, J. G., Carr, D., Groves, T., Helinski, M., . . . Guerin, P. J. (2016). Beyond open data: Realising the health benefits of sharing data. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 355, i5295. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5295.

Ross, J., Lehmann, R., & Gross, C. (2012). The importance of Clinical Trial Data Sharing: Toward More Open Science. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, 5(2), 238–240.

Ross-Hellauer, T., Deppe, A., & Schmidt, B. (2017). Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongs editors, authors and reviewers. PLoS ONE, 12(12), e0189311. The Royal Society (2012). Data Sharing. London.