Skip main navigation

Societally relevant and scientifically valid

In this article, Christian Pohl shows why ‘transdisciplinarians’ strive to produce knowledge that is societally relevant and scientifically valid.
With transdisciplinary research (TDR) we try to link two processes (see the two bold arrows in the diagram below). The arrow on the right side stands for society handling sustainability issues. The arrow on the left side shows research for sustainable development. Both arrows come together in TDR to jointly frame problems, to jointly conduct research, and to jointly explore impact.

If TDR brings together science and practice, it also brings together the respective rationalities. In the realm of science, the driving question is: ‘Is it true?’. Scientists want to understand how things are. Different disciplines, however, might have different ideas about exactly what truth is and whether and how far it can be achieved. Or what comprises solid evidence for a truth claim. Although the specific ideas about truth might differ from discipline to discipline, the underlying goal in the realm of science stays the same: To describe things as they really are. The typical mechanism to check the validity of research results is peer review. Peer review means that other experts in the field critically read through an expert’s publication, and check whether the described methods and results are correct.

In the realm of practice, the main question is not ‘Is it true?’ but rather ‘Does it work?’. If we want to change how society deals with sustainability issues, we have to change existing or implement new technologies, laws, products, or social habits. Such new approaches have to work. If, for instance, some people decide to change their habits and become vegan, this requires vegan products to be available for purchase on the market. Or, if a larger amount of electricity should be produced by solar panels from private households, this requires, amongst other things, panels that work technically, an electricity market that works for private solar panel producers economically, and laws that allow panels to be put on roofs. The typical mechanism to check whether something works is to put it into practice, often as a test run. If it works, no further justification is needed.

Diagram depicting the TDR process, which connects scientific knowledge production and societal problem handling. It shows three columns. From left to right: The realm of science, rigor and understanding the realm characterizes by the question “Is it true?”. In the middle the realm of transdisciplinary research, in which the functional-dynamic collaboration of disciplines and societal actors to investigate and handle sustainability issues takes place. The right-hand column is characterized by the question “Does it work?”. It is the realm of practice, relevance and design. In the left column science investigates sustainability issues, in the right-hand column society handles sustainability issues. In between transdisciplinary research happens in three phases: framing the problem, joint research and exploring impact. Arrows connect these phases and show, that each phase influences the others and that the process is iterative. Big arrows form circles between transdisciplinary research and the realm of science on the one hand and transdisciplinary research and the realm of practice on the other hand. This shows that the process also between these three realms is to be considered on-going, one is in constant exchange with the others, brokering the knowledges that are created. Transdisciplinary research process. (Click to expand)

One of the challenges of TDR is balancing between the world of science and that of practice. There are a number of tensions in the relationship: Some problems might be ‘hot topics’ in certain disciplines but currently not of practical relevance. This is the case with genetically modified seeds in Switzerland, which are researched but will not be released for political reasons. Another tension is that not all insights that are true are of practical relevance. And what is of practical relevance may already be scientifically well researched. In general, scientific rigour and practical relevance do not have to be conflicting aims but need to be balanced in transdisciplinary projects 1.

Author: Dr. Christian Pohl

References

1 Pohl, C., Krütli, P. & Stauffacher, M. (2017). Ten reflective steps for rendering research societally relevant. GAIA, 26(1), 43-51.

This article is from the free online

Partnering for Change: Link Research to Societal Challenges

Created by
FutureLearn - Learning For Life

Our purpose is to transform access to education.

We offer a diverse selection of courses from leading universities and cultural institutions from around the world. These are delivered one step at a time, and are accessible on mobile, tablet and desktop, so you can fit learning around your life.

We believe learning should be an enjoyable, social experience, so our courses offer the opportunity to discuss what you’re learning with others as you go, helping you make fresh discoveries and form new ideas.
You can unlock new opportunities with unlimited access to hundreds of online short courses for a year by subscribing to our Unlimited package. Build your knowledge with top universities and organisations.

Learn more about how FutureLearn is transforming access to education