Using the biopsychosocial model to examine risk factors in post-traumatic stress disorder
Given the multitude of factors potentially involved in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), it seems useful to consider PTSD risk and recovery through a biopsychosocial lens.
Although the biopsychosocial framework is helpful when considering risk and protective factors, it is important to note that there can be overlap between the different domains. For example, epidemiological data suggest that being female puts one at an increased risk of PTSD.
The mechanisms behind those gender differences are not fully understood. Genetic and physiological factors likely play a significant role (Ford et al., 2015). Women are also at an increased risk of sexual assault, which could be a trigger for PTSD. This illustrates the possible overlap between biological and social factors.
Risk factors
Examples of risk factors are offered in the table below:
| Biological factors | An underlying genetic predisposition, gender, physical injury and associated pain, hyperreactive physiological responses to stress, sleep, structural and functional brain abnormalities (for example, as a result of brain injury or chronic stress). |
| Psychological factors | A subjective experience of loss of control and perceived negative effect of the traumatic event on the individual (Hasto et al., 2013). Extreme anxiety and intrusive reexperiencing. Guilt. Subjective reactions to terrifying or horrifying events. Dissociation. Dysphoria. Social phobia. Anger. Trauma-related beliefs. |
| Social factors | Multiple exposures to trauma, social isolation and being at an increased risk of experiencing a traumatic event, for example, due to gender or substance misuse. |
Influencing factors
Social and cultural factors inevitably interact with biology to impact health. This confluence of factors shapes a person’s experience and definition of health and illness, their access to healthcare, their response to disease, pain and disability, their beliefs about healing, their treatment expectations and their health outcomes.
Some of these factors are indicated in the illustration below:
References
Ford, J. D., Grasso, D. J., Elhai, J. D., & Courtois, C. A. (2015). Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Scientific and Professional Dimensions. New York: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-374462-3.X0001-9
Hasto, J., Vojtova, H., Hruby, R., & Tavel, P. (2013). Biopsychosocial approach to psychological trauma and possible health consequences. Neuro-Endocrinology Letters, 34(6), 464-481. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24378444/
Rafla, M., Carson, N. J., & DeJong, S. M. (2014). Adolescents and the internet: What mental health clinicians need to know. Current Psychiatry Reports, 16(9), 1-10. doi:10.1007/s11920-014-0472-x
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in the Global Context
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in the Global Context
Reach your personal and professional goals
Unlock access to hundreds of expert online courses and degrees from top universities and educators to gain accredited qualifications and professional CV-building certificates.
Join over 18 million learners to launch, switch or build upon your career, all at your own pace, across a wide range of topic areas.
