We use cookies to give you a better experience. Carry on browsing if you're happy with this, or read our cookies policy for more information.

Skip main navigation

Corporate governance and accountability

Dr Alberto Asquer asks what are the rules and mechanisms set up to ensure that those who manage an organisation do it in the interest of the owners.
Box on wall with wording Anti corruption suggestion box
© SOAS
Corporate governance: it’s the system of rules and mechanisms set up to ensure that those who manage an organisation do it in the interest of the owners.
In the private sector, this means that managers should be primarily concerned with creating value for the shareholder, which results, for example, in dividends or in the increase of the value of shares over time. In the public sector, on the other hand, public managers use financial and other resources primarily to implement public programmes and to deliver quality public services.
Controlling the conduct of managers, however, is problematic for at least three reasons. Firstly, managers may have goals of their own that differ from those of the owners of the organisation. For example, individual citizens (and taxpayers) – who are ultimately the owners of public sector organisations – want efficient, timely and cheap public services. Some managers of public sector organisations may just want a secure job, with a decent salary and improved career prospects.
Secondly, the owners of an organisation don’t necessarily know what managers do. Managers are entrusted with managing public sector organisations and pursuing public objectives, but an individual citizen can’t scrutinise everything public managers do. Managers are typically held accountable for their conduct by looking at their overall performance rather than at any particular act or decision that they might make.
Finally, the owners of an organisation may induce managers to commit to pursuing public objectives through pay-for-performance schemes. These incentive schemes consist of salary arrangements where managers are paid more if they deliver a ‘better’ performance. In principle, these schemes should help align the interests of public managers with those of ordinary citizens. However, a manager can’t control every aspect of the performance of a public sector organisation. And of course, a manager might be tempted to manipulate performance records for his or her own benefit.
All in all, designing good mechanisms for corporate governance is very challenging. Many countries have experimented with various forms of pay-for-performance schemes in the public sector, with mixed results. Others have explored alternative routes, such as paying closer attention to the selection, training and motivation of civil servants. Others have enforced stricter rules, with auditors scrutinising the conduct of public officers in order to prevent, detect and correct wrongdoings.
© SOAS
This article is from the free online

Understanding Public Financial Management: How Is Your Money Spent?

Created by
FutureLearn - Learning For Life

Our purpose is to transform access to education.

We offer a diverse selection of courses from leading universities and cultural institutions from around the world. These are delivered one step at a time, and are accessible on mobile, tablet and desktop, so you can fit learning around your life.

We believe learning should be an enjoyable, social experience, so our courses offer the opportunity to discuss what you’re learning with others as you go, helping you make fresh discoveries and form new ideas.
You can unlock new opportunities with unlimited access to hundreds of online short courses for a year by subscribing to our Unlimited package. Build your knowledge with top universities and organisations.

Learn more about how FutureLearn is transforming access to education