Skip main navigation

Get 30% off one whole year of Unlimited learning. Subscribe for just £249.99 £174.99. T&Cs apply

The road to Dunhuang: The Korean Peninsula

How did Korean bookbinding compare to Japan's? In this article, Takahiro Sasaki examines detchōsō finds and the puzzling absence of tetsuyōsō.
Let’s begin our exploration by looking at the Korean Peninsula Prof. Takahiro Sasaki

Japanese book culture was strongly influenced by both China and the countries of the Korean Peninsula, which is connected to China by land.

We have already seen that detchōsō (butterfly binding) and tetsuyōsō (thread binding) both had serious weaknesses. So, let’s see whether these same binding styles were also used in these neighbouring regions.

We’ll begin with the Korean Peninsula. It played an important role in the history of Japanese books: papermaking reached Japan through the peninsula in the seventh century, followed many centuries later by movable-type printing in the late 16th century.

Movable-type printing was widely used on the Korean Peninsula. Most of the printed books I had come across were fukurotoji (pouch-bound), in Japanese terminology — a binding particularly suited to producing books in large numbers. For a long time, I knew very little about the use of other binding styles there.

Then I heard that some printed books in detchōsō (butterfly binding) had been found inside Buddhist statues relatively recently. The statues had acted almost like time capsules, preserving old books inside them. Finding books and other materials inside Buddhist statues is not unusual in Japan either.

Curious to learn more, I asked a Korean colleague who specialises in bibliography (*Note). I learned that three examples of detchōsō, dating from around the end of the 14th century, have been identified.

Here they are:

All three were made in the same way. Each sheet was folded vertically in half, with the printed side facing inwards. Paste was applied near the fold, and the folded sheets were then stacked in the same direction to form a codex.

In structure, this is the same as detchōsō found in early Japanese manuscripts. But there is an interesting difference: in these Korean examples, only one side of each sheet was printed. Among the manuscripts Kūkai brought back from China, thin sheets were written on only one side, while thicker sheets were written on both sides. In later Japanese detchōsō manuscripts, however, both sides of the paper were normally used for writing.

So, while the basic structure is familiar from Japanese detchōsō, these three examples seem to show a strong influence from Chinese printed books.

What, then, about tetsuyōsō (thread binding)? As far as I know, no examples have been identified on the Korean Peninsula.

This leaves me with a puzzling question: why did a binding style that does not seem to have been used on the Korean Peninsula become so widely used in Japan?

Note: We are grateful to Eury Lee (李裕利), a curator at the National Museum of Korean Literature, for kindly sharing her expertise on these examples.

This article is from the free online

Global Codex: Hidden Stories of Books Across Cultures

Created by
FutureLearn - Learning For Life