Skip main navigation

Flawed funding models and preparedness

The existing financing system for humanitarian response does not currently support preparedness.
© Coventry University. CC BY-NC 4.0

In the current humanitarian system, agreed coordinated plans for post-disaster action will not be sufficient on their own. The existing financing system for humanitarian response does not currently support preparedness and anticipatory response actions.

The global humanitarian system is funded by voluntary contributions, commonly sought after the disaster has happened through appeals to the public and donor governments. In many cases, donors are ‘benefactors’ for a good cause, but being generous after a disaster is too late. All too often, monies pledged by donors do not materialise in full and are part of a complex political and economic interplay between states, politicians and voters. National and local governments struggle to rapidly reallocate funds from other budgets.

Money given for preparedness results in disasters not happening in the first place, and yet there is limited glory in that for funders. Should a disaster occur simultaneously with another newsworthy event, media coverage of the disaster is crowded out, resulting in lower than expected public donations. We need to review the uncertainties of funding response and the difficulties of operating in the highly politicised post-disaster arena.

There’s a further challenge to contend with: while we are in a position to monitor, assess and forecast many events now, the effective financial planning needed to support preparedness plans is not secure and reliable.

Your task

Read the sections titled ‘A flawed funding model’ and ‘The consequences’ on pages 15-22 of Dull Disasters by Clarke and Dercon (2016). It is available as a downloadable PDF in the downloads section at the bottom of the page.
In your view, what are the three most significant consequences of the current humanitarian response funding system? Give reasons for your choices in the comments area.

References

Clarke, D. J., and Dercon, S. (2016) Dull Disasters?: How Planning Ahead Will Make a Difference [online] New York: Oxford University Press. available from https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198785576.001.0001 [21 April 2020]

© Coventry University. CC BY-NC 4.0
This article is from the free online

Humanitarian Action, Response and Relief

Created by
FutureLearn - Learning For Life

Our purpose is to transform access to education.

We offer a diverse selection of courses from leading universities and cultural institutions from around the world. These are delivered one step at a time, and are accessible on mobile, tablet and desktop, so you can fit learning around your life.

We believe learning should be an enjoyable, social experience, so our courses offer the opportunity to discuss what you’re learning with others as you go, helping you make fresh discoveries and form new ideas.
You can unlock new opportunities with unlimited access to hundreds of online short courses for a year by subscribing to our Unlimited package. Build your knowledge with top universities and organisations.

Learn more about how FutureLearn is transforming access to education