Skip main navigation

Get 30% off one whole year of Unlimited learning. Subscribe for just £249.99 £174.99. T&Cs apply

From naming to showing

How can naming skills lead to usable evidence. In this article, Wendy Palmer explores how small shifts in questioning makes student capability visible
Two students conducting a science experiment
© RDNE Stock project, pexels.com
Last week, Ms Rivera tried something small. She didn’t redesign her lesson or introduce a new framework. She simply rewrote one task. Instead of asking her students to “complete a science experiment on insulation”, she described it a little differently:
Test different materials, observe results, and explain which worked best and why.
It’s a very small change, but as the students worked, instead of asking, “Is this right?” students began asking, “Why do you think that happened?” and “Should we try it another way?”
By the end of the lesson, Ms Rivera noticed that students were more engaged in what they were doing, but when she asked them what they had learned…
Most still talked about the task:
  • “We did an experiment.”
  • “We tested materials.”
The skills were there, but they were still just beneath the surface.

The Next Step

This is where many teachers find themselves, once you start naming skills, you can see them everywhere.
  • In the way students approach a task.
  • In the decisions they make.
  • In how they respond when something doesn’t work.
But seeing skills is not the same as making them visible. Because visibility requires something more, It requires evidence. Because evidence is what allows others to recognise and interpret what a student can do.

What Does It Mean to Show a Skill?

The next day, Ms Rivera tried something different. As students worked, she paused one group and asked, “Talk me through what you changed, and why.” At first, the response was simple. “We just tried a different material.”
So she prompted again, “What made you decide to change it?” This time, the answer went further. “Because the temperature dropped too quickly… so we thought it wasn’t insulating properly.” Now the students weren’t just doing the task, they were explaining their thinking and they were making their decisions visible.

From Description to Evidence

This is the shift we’re exploring this week. Moving from: “I used problem-solving skills” to: “I tested a different approach when the first one didn’t work, and adjusted based on the results.”

The first is a description, the second is evidence and that difference matters, because evidence shows how a skill is applied, not just that it exists.

Why This Matters for Learners

When students can articulate their skills:

  • They understand their own learning more clearly
  • They can explain what they’ve done and why
  • They are better able to apply those skills in new situations

And importantly, others can understand it too. Teachers, peers. future educators, parents and employers.

A Small Shift, Not More Work

What’s important here is that Ms Rivera didn’t add more content. She didn’t create a new assessment. She simply asked slightly different questions that prompted students to explain their thinking and the processes behind how they were working. That’s often where visibility begins and you start to build skills literacy into how people learn.

Looking Ahead

In the next steps, we’ll explore practical ways to capture this kind of evidence more consistently. So that these moments don’t just happen occasionally, but become part of how learning is recognised and understood.

Points to consider

What changed for you last week when you began rewriting tasks in skills-focused language?

© Lifelong Learning Practice
This article is from the free online

Lifelong Learning: Recognise and Articulate School Skills

Created by
FutureLearn - Learning For Life