Asking answerable question (Part 2: examples)

The PICO Framework helps structure research questions in evidence-based practice.

By using PICO, researchers and practitioners can efficiently find and apply relevant evidence to improve public health outcomes.

The PICO framework is a structured approach to developing research questions in Evidence-Based Practice. It helps break down complex clinical issues into key components: Population (P), Intervention (I), Comparison (C), and Outcome (O).

In the video, several examples illustrate how PICO can be applied in different scenarios. The following scenarios illustrate how PICO can be applied in real-world situations.

1. Henry’s Preference for Alternative Medicine

Henry, a botanist with depression, prefers St. John’s Wort, a herbal remedy, over prescribed Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs). He believes it may be just as effective in managing his symptoms.

Using the PICO model, the research question becomes: “Is St. John’s Wort more effective than SSRIs for reducing depressive symptoms in adult males?”

This question helps guide research into the comparative effectiveness of herbal treatments versus conventional antidepressants.

2. George’s Concerns About Vasectomy

George is considering a vasectomy as a permanent birth control method but is worried about potential long-term risks, particularly the risk of testicular cancer.

The PICO framework helps frame the question: “Does a vasectomy increase the risk of testicular cancer in adult males?”

By structuring the question this way, researchers can examine existing studies to determine if there is a proven association between vasectomy and cancer risk.

3. Tom’s Journey to Quit Smoking

Tom has been a smoker for 20 years and has struggled with quitting. He is considering e-cigarettes but wants to know if they are effective.

Initially, the question is framed as: “Are e-cigarettes effective for smokers to quit?”

Since this question lacks a comparison, it can be refined further.

If a study compares e-cigarettes to nicotine patches, the revised question becomes: “Are e-cigarettes more effective than nicotine patches for smokers to quit?”

This allows for a direct comparison of two smoking cessation methods.

4. Childhood Seizures and Parental Decisions

Parents of children who experience a first seizure often face the difficult decision of whether to start antiepileptic treatment. Since there may not always be a clear intervention or comparison, the focus shifts to predictive factors for seizure recurrence.

The research question becomes: “What factors predict the risk of further seizures in children after a first seizure?”

Here, factors like high fever, family history, and congenital issues serve as predictors, influencing the decision to begin treatment.

5. Telemedicine vs. In-Person Care

Maria, who lives in a rural area, is managing diabetes and wants to know whether telemedicine is as effective as in-person care for controlling blood sugar levels.

Using PICO, the research question is: “Is telemedicine as effective as in-person care for managing blood sugar levels in adults with diabetes?”

A study comparing HbA1c levels over six months in telemedicine and in-person groups could provide insight into the effectiveness of remote healthcare solutions.

These examples demonstrate how the PICO framework can flexibly apply to different healthcare scenarios. While some research questions include all four components, others may only require Population and Outcome, particularly in prognosis-related questions.

Additionally, elements like Time (T) can refine a research question further. By carefully structuring questions, healthcare professionals can efficiently search for relevant evidence, leading to better-informed decisions and improved patient care.