Skip main navigation

A bit of history – different ways operators were symbolised through history

In this article, Dr. Yossi Elran presents a short history of some of the symbols of well-known operators.
Illustration of animated kids looking blankly at math symbols
© Davidson Institute of Science Education, the educational arm of the Weizmann Institute of Science

Probably the most difficult task a mathematician or a math historian encounters in their day-to-day job is understanding the language. The language of math is symbolic. There are symbols for numbers – we saw that last week; there are symbols for mathematical operations: +, -, x etc. and there are symbols for other mathematical objects such as sets, geometrical shapes and so on. Unfortunately, although math is an international language, there are still today different notations for the same thing, for example, in symmetry, the following five (!) notations all mean the same thing, and are all used today!

xx means the same as pg means the same as C2II means the same as D1gg means the same as W13

This makes things very awkward for people who actually want to try and understand what’s going on! Thank goodness, John H. Conway, Heidi Burgiel and Chaim Goodman-Strauss wrote a dictionary style translation of all the different symmetry notations like the one above at the back of their monumental book, “The Symmetry of Things”.

If you’re a historian, things get even worse. Throughout history, for various reasons, different symbols evolved for the same mathematical objects. Even those symbols that are now internationally (more or less) accepted looked different. This makes it very difficult to decipher things that notable mathematicians like Isaac Newton or Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz wrote in the past. In fact, both these mathematicians invented calculus at the same time, using different notations! Leibniz used the first letter of the Latin word summa, which at that time was an elongated s to symbolize integration, whereas Newton used different notations at the same time (?!) for integrals, one of them is a small vertical bar above the integrand.

The integral wasn’t the first symbol that Leibniz invented in competition with other symbols for the same thing. In 1698, he wrote: “I do not like X as a symbol for multiplication…” and introduced a dot instead of the usual x. Indeed, dots are still used to indicated multiplication in certain cases, such as scalar multiplication of matrices, and in modern algebra the symbol for multiplication is omitted altogether!

If you are interested in the history of mathematical symbols, here is one of the best explanations on the web.

© Davidson Institute of Science Education, the educational arm of the Weizmann Institute of Science
This article is from the free online

Maths Puzzles: Cryptarithms, Symbologies and Secret Codes

Created by
FutureLearn - Learning For Life

Our purpose is to transform access to education.

We offer a diverse selection of courses from leading universities and cultural institutions from around the world. These are delivered one step at a time, and are accessible on mobile, tablet and desktop, so you can fit learning around your life.

We believe learning should be an enjoyable, social experience, so our courses offer the opportunity to discuss what you’re learning with others as you go, helping you make fresh discoveries and form new ideas.
You can unlock new opportunities with unlimited access to hundreds of online short courses for a year by subscribing to our Unlimited package. Build your knowledge with top universities and organisations.

Learn more about how FutureLearn is transforming access to education