Excerpt from ,by John G. Blair and Jerusha McCormack(2003), Fudan University Press
This article is excerpted from Western Civilization with Chinese Comparisons, by John G. Blair and Jerusha McCormack (2003), Fudan University Press.
Etymologically yang and yin are as intimately connected as the two sides of a hill: yin associated with the shady side, yang the sunny side. Gradually there emerged a complex scheme to make sense of all existing things by one or the other of these two principles of movement through correlated opposites. Here is one traditional listing, from documents found in 1973 in Mawangdui tombs from the 3rd century BCE:
yang
yin
Heaven
Earth
Summer
Winter
Spring
Autumn
Day
Night
Big States
Small States
Action
Inaction
Stretching
Contracting
Ruler
Minister
Above
Below
Man
Woman
Elder Brother
Younger Brother
Father
Child
Getting on in the world
Being stuck where one is
Taking a wife
Having a funeral
Noble
Base
Guest
Host
Controlling others
Being controlled by others
Speech
Silence
Giving
Receiving
Soldiers
Laborers
[source: A.C. Graham, Yin-Yang and the Nature of Correlative Thinking (Singapore: Institute of East Asian Philosophies, 1986),27-28.]
Clearly such lists could be extended indefinitely. Chinese correlative associations constitute a a total system in which everything that might come up in the Chinese world will find a place. Western knowledge aspires to “universality,” as exemplified in “natural laws” which apply everywhere and to all peoples, or the belief in one God who is present everywhere at all times. WCwCC(Western Civilization with Chinese Comparisons) calls the Chinese approach “total” in because it is all-inclusive within the world governed by Chinese culture: nothing can happen that is not susceptible to be included in the system.