Skip main navigation

Get 30% off one whole year of Unlimited learning. Subscribe for just £249.99 £174.99. T&Cs apply

Case study: translanguaging in action

Case study: Translanguaging in action
Nine panels of silhouettes engaged in conversation
© wal_172619 on Pixabay

In the earlier video, we learnt about translanguaging, which challenges traditional views of how multilingual people use their languages.

Rather than having separate language systems which they access independently, translanguaging suggests that they draw on one big linguistic repertoire in different communicative contexts (Vogel & García, 2017). This idea is particularly prevalent in English as an Additional Language (EAL) classrooms where, rather than being forced to use only one language, students are encouraged to use all of their linguistic knowledge to complete tasks.

The idea of translanguaging has become popular in recent years as it is designed to:

“[foster] positive attitudes towards multilingualism and [encourage] EAL learners to be proud of their language skills.” (The Bell Foundation, 2025).
However, you might wonder how effective translanguaging is in practice. In this article, we will look at one case study which offers insight into the efficacy of translanguaging practices compared to more traditional methods.

Translanguaging in Turkey

The case we are exploring is a study carried out by Yuzlu and Dikilitaş (2021) in Turkey. It investigated the effect of translanguaging on the listening, speaking, reading and writing skills of Turkish learners of English. It also sought to understand students’ perceptions of this approach. 120 students took part in the 10 week experiment, half of them at a pre-intermediate level of English and the other half upper-intermediate. They were split into two control groups which received more traditional training and an experimental group which was taught using translanguaging principles.
The first control group followed the Grammar Translation Method (GTM), which involves continuous translation from English into Turkish. The other group received English-medium instruction based on the Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) approach which encourages students to constantly use the target language but not their first language.
The experimental group received translanguaging instruction which systematically integrated both Turkish and English. This approach switched equally between English and Turkish, drawing on bilingual reading materials; allowing students to help each other in either language and listening to bilingual dialogues.

Improved language skills

We might assume that allowing students to use their first language while learning English would have a negative effect on their acquisition of English. However, statistical analysis revealed that the translanguaging group significantly outperformed the GTM and CLT groups in both reading, writing, listening and speaking. It therefore seems that, not only is there no harm in allowing students to draw on their full linguistic repertoire, it can in fact be beneficial.

Positive student perceptions

The student interviews also indicated strong approval for translanguaging. Perceptions were overwhelmingly positive, with students in that group reporting that translanguaging helped them make meaning, understand topics, and convey messages effectively. It also promoted autonomous learning, allowing students to choose the language they used, leading to more learning and real communication.
One student commented:
“I felt more powerful when I could practise two of the languages. I came to understand that I am bilingual. It is a good feeling.”

This suggests that translanguaging promotes greater awareness of students’ skills.

Was it all positive?

Yuzlu and Dikilitaş (2021) report that about one fifth of translanguaging students expressed reluctance to use Turkish in the EFL classroom because “learning English should not involve other languages”. The researchers suggest that this reflects a “deeply rooted monoglossic attitude”. That is, the students have grown up in an environment where speaking anything other than the target language is wrong and discouraged. It may be, therefore, that teachers need to dismantle traditional expectations of language learning and help students to understand how using their first language in conjunction with another can foster a greater sense of learning and belonging.

Implementing translanguaging

This study provides strong evidence for the benefits of translanguaging in high school foreign language teaching. It suggests that the systematic, flexible use of both Turkish and English as instructional and interactional languages can be highly beneficial. The findings encourage educators to “reconsider one-language policies” and integrate “translanguaging practices into curriculum, materials and even evaluation criteria”. They suggest that teachers be trained in translanguaging practices to make the most of the benefits it can provide.

One case study is not enough to conclude that translanguaging is the perfect teaching method. However, research is ongoing and the evidence suggests that translanguaging fosters pride in learners’ skills and creates a more positive and inclusive learning environment which empowers students and enhances their communication.

References

The Bell Foundation. (2025). Translanguaging. The Bell Foundation. https://www.bell-foundation.org.uk/resources/great-ideas/translanguaging/

Vogel, S., & García, O. (2017). Translanguaging. In G. Noblit (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of education. Oxford University Press.

Yasar Yuzlu, M., & Dikilitas, K. (2022). Translanguaging in the development of EFL learners’ foreign language skills in Turkish context. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 16(2), 176-190.

© University of York
This article is from the free online

The Power of Languages

Created by
FutureLearn - Learning For Life