Skip main navigation

Bioterrorism and laboratory risk

The relationship between bioterrorism and laboratory risks are explored in this step.
PROFESSOR RAINA MACINTYRE: Now, let’s ask, if you publish a method for creating a 3D printer down on the internet, what’s the probability that someone who wants to harm people will use that method. If a method for genetic engineering of pathogenic viruses is published, what’s the probability that terrorists will use it? Think about that. Now, the other issue to think about is insider threat. This whole concept of being able to trust someone because they’re a doctor, a scientist, a professor, it’s a fallacy. There are just numerous cases of misconduct in science, some involving infectious diseases. Insider threat is a real issue.
In fact, the US Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction said, given the high level of know how needed, we should be less concerned that terrorists will become biologists and far more concerned that biologists will become terrorists. In fact, in the 2001 anthrax attack in the United States, it was a US Army scientist who became the main suspect. And that led to the Fink Report in 2004. Insider threat is classically seen as stealing of secrets in the corporate world. But in biological science, it may also include illegal or risky research that’s not sanctioned. The same factors apply as any other types of crime, greed, revenge, divided loyalty, blackmail, ego, work or family problems, or ideology.
But additional factors include patents on drugs and vaccines, fame, high impact publications, grant funding, and funding of laboratories. So you may have lone wolf insiders or insiders who are colluding with outside groups. In fact, terrorist groups may seek to infiltrate labs from the grassroots, through junior scientists, PhD students, or they may coop senior scientists within. So in other words, universities, defence, and research institutions are at high risk of insider threat. Where does dual use research of concern occur? It occurs in universities, scientific institutions, do-it-yourself labs, homes, anywhere. Do-it-yourself biology is a rising phenomenon. They are DIY biology labs all over the world, including New York, Sydney, San Francisco.
And the philosophy here is that anyone should be free to experiment, and do experiments, can just walk off the street and experiment in these labs. It’s very hard to monitor and place these kind of laboratories.
In this video, Professor MacIntyre will discuss the various forms of laboratory risks and how they relate to bioterrorism. The different levels of laboratory protections against high risk biological agents will be outlined.
After watching this video, discuss the answer to this question in the comments section below:
What are some of the things that could go wrong with laboratory protections that could lead to the release of a biological agent? Are there any examples you can think of where this has occurred?
This article is from the free online

Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Public Health Dimensions

Created by
FutureLearn - Learning For Life

Our purpose is to transform access to education.

We offer a diverse selection of courses from leading universities and cultural institutions from around the world. These are delivered one step at a time, and are accessible on mobile, tablet and desktop, so you can fit learning around your life.

We believe learning should be an enjoyable, social experience, so our courses offer the opportunity to discuss what you’re learning with others as you go, helping you make fresh discoveries and form new ideas.
You can unlock new opportunities with unlimited access to hundreds of online short courses for a year by subscribing to our Unlimited package. Build your knowledge with top universities and organisations.

Learn more about how FutureLearn is transforming access to education