Skip main navigation

The personal impact of resistance

This video explains the personal impact of resistance. Video created by Small-r

Watch this clip from the “Resistance” video produced by ‘small-r’ in which a doctor explains the impact resistance has on his ability to treat his patient. Once you have watched the clip read the article below by Dr David Jenkins, consultant medical microbiologist and infection prevention and control (IPC) doctor at University Hospitals of Leicester (UHL) NHS Trust.

In 2014 WHO published a report looking at resistance around the world. This survey highlighted major gaps in data on the extent of antibacterial resistance and types and number of infections caused by bacteria that had become resistant to antibacterial drugs.

Issues of concern included the lack of microbiology laboratories in some areas of the world and differences in laboratory susceptibility testing methods. Bacteria that are described as sensitive in some laboratories may be classed as resistant in labs using different testing protocols. There may also be variation in the types of clinical specimens studied, the number of bacterial isolates tested and the range of anti-bacterials investigated. In countries with few laboratories the susceptibility reports may only reflect the situation in limited parts of the country.

In order to compile the report, the WHO looked to ministries of health, national reference laboratories and public health institutes for surveillance information. When these were unable to provide data, surveillance results from unofficial networks and published articles were sought.

The basis of the WHO document was the availability of data on resistance for selected bacteria-antibacterial drug combinations. The largest gaps in data were in Africa, the Middle East and European countries outside the European Union.

The report focused on 7 different bacterial species: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, non-Typhoidal Salmonella species, Shigella species and Neisseria gonorrhoea together with their susceptibility to clinically important antibacterial classes. The take home message was that antibacterial resistance is indeed a global problem. All of the WHO regions have problems with resistance, however information about susceptibility came from only a few countries, therefore we have no idea of the extent of antibacterial resistance.

However, it is worth pointing out that in some regions of the world there are active and organised steps to carry out surveillance. Two good examples are ReLAVRA (Latin American antimicrobial resistance surveillance network) and EARS-Net (European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network) which is hosted by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC).

An example of antimicrobial resistance surveillance by ECDC reported on the prevalence of selected bacteria causing infections acquired in intensive care units across Europe. The overall picture is one of increasing resistance: within one year the proportion of S. aureus infections caused by MRSA increased from 36% to 46%. Between 2009/10 the proportion of infections by E. coli resistant to 3rd generation Cephalosporins increased from 16%-23%. While the proportion of infections caused by Klebsiella species resistant to these antibiotics increased from 28%-38%. Nearly 90% of Acinetobacter species infections were resistant to Carbapenems, antibiotics often considered to be the last hope for treating infections caused by this organism. The evidence for a global resistance crisis is overwhelming:

  • In the USA the large majority of 99,000 deaths each year caused by hospital acquired infections are caused by resistant bacteria and the annual cost of managing these infections may be as much as $34 billion per year.

  • In Europe antibacterial resistant organisms account for 25,000 deaths per year at a cost of 2.5 million extra hospital days. The cost is approximately 1.5 billion euros per year due in part to 600 million days of lost productivity.

  • Developing countries are also hit hard by resistance: Thailand has more than 140,000 antibiotic resistant infections each year causing 30,000 deaths; in Pakistan 71% of infections in neonates are caused by resistant infections, and in Peru and Bolivia the majority of hospital infections are caused by antibiotic resistant bacteria.

  • The World Economic Forum in its 2013 Global Risks Report put antimicrobial resistance on a par with the unrestricted proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and global economic meltdown.

The report points out that many people take for granted that antibiotics will always be available when we need them and that even in the highest income countries few people go through out life without needing antibiotics.

Consequently, the emergence and spread of resistance is something that should cause fear in all of us.

How familiar are you with the situation in your country, location or organisation? Are others in your country, location or organisation aware of this situation?

See more about the Resistance film here.

Please note that this text and video are used by kind permission of the University of Dundee and are taken from the FutureLearn course Antimicrobial Stewardship: Managing Antibiotic Resistance.

This article is from the free online

Challenges in Antibiotic Resistance: Gram Negative Bacteria

Created by
FutureLearn - Learning For Life

Reach your personal and professional goals

Unlock access to hundreds of expert online courses and degrees from top universities and educators to gain accredited qualifications and professional CV-building certificates.

Join over 18 million learners to launch, switch or build upon your career, all at your own pace, across a wide range of topic areas.

Start Learning now