Rostow's theory of growth
Is economic growth a framework for change or a single narrative?
Development as it is known today (whether envisaged as an ideology or an aspiration) emerged as a priority following the Second World War II when colonised countries were demanding and achieving independence.
Postwar political and economic fragility surfaced as global political allegiances were changing and the Cold War beginning.
In 1960, Walt Whitman Rostow published an influential theory of economic growth that was taken up widely in the development sector.
This theory led to a single narrative about economic development, in which:
- the major barriers to a nation’s development were perceived to be internal to that nation (bad government, poverty, primitive economies, non-competitive subsistence living, drought, lack of infrastructure)
- the objective was for countries to modernise their economies.
However, over time, development theories demonstrated that some of the major obstacles to development were actually external to countries, mainly unfair trading systems that benefited the richer countries.
This is outlined in the following infographic:
Rostow’s theory prescribes a universal path towards development.
But is economic growth the best path to development? Or is it the only one we know?
Discuss your thinking, including some substantiated justifications for it, in the comments.
© Deakin University