Want to keep learning?

This content is taken from the University of York's online course, Modern Sculpture: An Introduction to Art History. Join the course to learn more.
A photograph looking down on a green bucket lid. Resting on top of the lid are two plastering tools. One is covered in a dollop of white plaster.
Plaster - not just for covering walls

Hepworth and plaster casts

Last week, we looked at the some of the new materials twentieth-century sculptors were beginning to use in their work.

Plaster was one of these new materials. It had started as just a preparatory and training tool but later became a material used in its own right in finished sculptures. However, with only a few exceptions, Hepworth used plaster solely as a preparatory and reference material. Still, Hepworth’s plasters provide vital insight into the artist’s working methods and processes.

Nearly 200 Hepworth plasters survive, some of which are displayed at The Hepworth Wakefield and Tate St. Ives, where her original studio is preserved in perfect condition. Art historians often use preparatory objects, items such as sketchbooks, photographs, maquettes and prototypes, to study finished works of art.

Investigating preparatory material uncovers three things:

  • It helps us to understand the multiple steps taken to create a work of art.
  • It reveals the other craftspeople involved in making art, especially sculpture, such as studio assistants, modellers, foundry workers, and labourers who pack and transport works.
  • It informs us how technical processes feed into the meaning of artworks.

Hepworth’s feeling towards plaster as a material was complicated. She once wrote,

“Plaster is […] a dead material excluding all the magical and sensuous qualities of the sculptural idea.”

However, in the years following this statement, she began to work with plaster as a way of continuing her love of carving into a phase of her career when she was predominantly working with bronze. Hepworth started her career as a sculptor working mostly with wood and stone, materials that she could chisel and carve away at. As she found success and received more large-scale public commissions, she started to work with bronze as a means to achieve “open, fluid and more complex forms”.

By continuing to model bronze works in plaster, she was able to effectively work between two contrasting sculptural techniques: the first technique was with the notion of direct carving, which we explored in relation to Epstein’s bust of Ralph Vaughan Williams. She achieved this by working directly with the plaster, applying texture and markings to the surfaces with her hands and tools. The second technique was bronze casting which meant that she had to send her plaster prototype to a foundry for it to be cast by a team of trusted technicians. Working between carving and casting through plaster and bronze, Hepworth was able to push the boundaries of her work.

In this video, you can see Hepworth working on a plaster cast for another work called Figure for Landscape and talk about her working processes.

This is an additional video, hosted on YouTube.

Reference

Sophie Bowness ‘Barbara Hepworth’s Studio Practice: Plaster for Bronze’ in Barbara Hepworth The Plasters: The Gift to Wakefield edited by Sophie Bowness (London: Lund Humphries, 2011), 31-96.

Share this article:

This article is from the free online course:

Modern Sculpture: An Introduction to Art History

University of York

Get a taste of this course

Find out what this course is like by previewing some of the course steps before you join: