Want to keep learning?

This content is taken from the University of Basel & Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences 's online course, Partnering for Change: Link Research to Societal Challenges. Join the course to learn more.

Skip to 0 minutes and 9 seconds Transdisciplinarity co-creation normally happens in the context of face-to-face communication. Involved actors, for example, are representatives from public administrations, researchers, private companies, political parties, and civil organisations engaged in promoting environmental concerns, issues of social justice, or human rights.

Skip to 0 minutes and 42 seconds All these different groups of actors might have different and sometimes conflicting views on a topic. Let’s take, as an example, two conflicting views about the effects of climate change on artificial snowmaking in the southern Swiss Alps. Arguments against artificial snowmaking

Skip to 1 minute and 7 seconds might be: the sustaining of mass tourism, the use of scarce water, soil compaction, and the fact that we herewith only combat the symptoms instead of the causes of climate change.

Skip to 1 minute and 24 seconds Arguments in favour might be: the attraction of tourists, the creation of employments, the maintaining of social life in rural areas, or the fact that tourism brings investments which pay for roads, water, and energy provision. A first challenge in this process relates to the fact that the involved actors often do not only have different views on the topic, but they are also holding different power positions. This is illustrated in the power-interest-matrix For example, the power to influence the decisions about artificial snowmaking is much higher for tourism operators and hotel owners than for environmentalists or visitors interested in soft tourism, often living outside the local context in which decisions are taken.

Skip to 2 minutes and 26 seconds How can we avoid that processes co-creation of knowledge reflect these power relations? If not considered, co-creation of knowledge could easily contribute to the consolidation of existing power asymmetries. How can we assure that the voices of all participants are heard equally, regardless of their power positions? This is a first fundamental challenge of transdisciplinary co-creation of knowledge. Research on co-creation of knowledge has proven to be successful in overcoming the ‘power challenge’ when it triggers social learning processes. Social learning represents communication and interaction at the micro-levels of social organisation. Social learning processes create room for joint reflection and democratic action, in which the power relations among participants are replaced by the ‘power of the most convincing argument’.

Skip to 3 minutes and 43 seconds Consequently, evaluating to what degree transdisciplinary co-creation of knowledge enables effective social learning is an important quality criterion. It shows how effective we are in addressing the ‘power challenge’ of transdisciplinarity.

Skip to 4 minutes and 7 seconds A second fundamental challenge refers to the question, what can we do if the possibilities of local actions alone are not enough to really find a satisfying solution? An example would be when local actors privilege artificial snowmaking despite the presence of opposing opinions coming from outside the local context. This challenge can be addressed by linking social learning processes at micro-level with societal learning processes at macro-level This happens when social learning leads to collective action that aims at changing social, political, or economic institutions and power relations defined beyond the local context. This is often the case when local progress cannot be made without changing laws, rules, and regulations existing on behalf of regional, national, or international private or public entities.

Skip to 5 minutes and 20 seconds An example that often helps in these cases is the engagement of local groups that start allying with other local, regional, and national organisations willing to help in changing societal institutions more generally. In such cases, the resulting societal learning processes often opt for increasing the democratisation of decision making, integrating the local with the regional, national, or international levels.

Upscaling transdisciplinarity through societal learning

Transdisciplinary co-creation is normally based on face-to-face communication and concerns micro-levels of social organisation.

The co-creation of knowledge is successful to the degree it triggers a social learning process resulting in a shared understanding of the problem and options to solve it. Social learning processes create room for joint reflection and democratic action, in which the power relations among participants are replaced by the ‘power of the most convincing argument’. If the social learning processes identify structural constraints that impede the realisation of the solutions proposed by the participants at micro-levels, social learning transforms into societal learning that not only focusses on improving the conditions at micro-, but also at meso- and macro-levels.

Educator: Prof. Stephan Rist

Share this video:

This video is from the free online course:

Partnering for Change: Link Research to Societal Challenges

University of Basel