Skip main navigation

New offer! Get 30% off one whole year of Unlimited learning. Subscribe for just £249.99 £174.99. New subscribers only. T&Cs apply

Find out more

This step-by-step guide provides researchers with practical guidance on designing and conducting mixed methods health research

Now, let's move to our step-by-step guide to conducting mixed methods research and get introduced to the process.

Step 1: Define the Research Objectives and Questions Clearly articulate the research objectives and develop specific research questions that address the unique health challenges in the conflict-affected population. Consider both the quantitative and qualitative aspects of the research topic to ensure comprehensive data collection and analysis. Step 2: Choose an Appropriate Study Design Select a study design that integrates quantitative and qualitative methods, such as the convergent design, explanatory design, or exploratory design. Ensure that the chosen design aligns with the research objectives and allows for the integration of both data types. Step 3: Determine the Sampling Strategy Develop a sampling strategy that allows for the recruitment of participants who represent the target population in the conflict-affected setting. Consider the availability of resources, access to participants, and ethical considerations. Employ appropriate sampling techniques for both quantitative (e.g., random sampling) and qualitative (e.g., purposeful sampling) components of the research. Step 4: Data Collection Collect quantitative data through surveys, questionnaires, or medical records, ensuring standardization and consistency. Simultaneously, employ qualitative methods such as interviews, focus groups, or observations to capture the lived experiences and contextual factors. Train data collectors to ensure data quality and consistency. Step 5: Data Analysis Analyze quantitative data using statistical methods to derive numerical results and identify patterns or associations. Analyze qualitative data using thematic analysis or content analysis to identify key themes, insights, and narratives. Conduct separate analyses for each data type while remaining open to potential integration during the synthesis phase. Step 6: Data Integration and Synthesis Integrate the quantitative and qualitative findings to gain a comprehensive understanding of the research topic. Look for patterns, connections, or discrepancies between the two data sets. Use techniques such as matrix displays, joint displays, or side-by-side comparisons to facilitate data integration and synthesis. Step 7: Interpretation and Discussion Interpret the integrated findings, drawing conclusions that encompass both the quantitative and qualitative dimensions of the research. Discuss the implications of the findings in the context of the conflict-affected setting, considering the social, cultural, and political factors that influence health outcomes. Step 8: Dissemination and Utilization of Findings Share the research findings with relevant stakeholders, policymakers, and the affected community to inform interventions, policies, and programs. Utilize various communication channels such as reports, presentations, or policy briefs to ensure the findings reach the target audience and contribute to positive change.

Example: A mixed methods health research study is conducted to assess the impact of conflict on child nutrition in a war-torn region. The quantitative component involves conducting household surveys to collect data on child nutritional status, dietary practices, and household characteristics. Simultaneously, qualitative data are gathered through in-depth interviews with caregivers to explore their perceptions of food security, coping strategies, and barriers to accessing nutritious food. The study design is a convergent parallel design, where the qualitative phase and the quantitative phase are conducted separately but at the same time, and provides a deeper understanding of the quantitative findings. The integrated analysis reveals that although quantitative data indicate a high prevalence of malnutrition, qualitative insights highlight contextual factors such as food insecurity, displacement, and limited access to healthcare that contribute to the nutrition crisis in the conflict-affected population.

Conclusion: Designing and conducting mixed methods health research in conflict settings requires careful planning, integration of quantitative and qualitative methods, and consideration of ethical considerations. Following this step-by-step guide

This article is from the free online

Conducting Health Research in Conflict Settings: Navigating Research Challenges for Impactful Evidence

Created by
FutureLearn - Learning For Life

Reach your personal and professional goals

Unlock access to hundreds of expert online courses and degrees from top universities and educators to gain accredited qualifications and professional CV-building certificates.

Join over 18 million learners to launch, switch or build upon your career, all at your own pace, across a wide range of topic areas.

Start Learning now