Skip main navigation

Data sources for measuring quality of care

Collecting and reporting data takes up 33% of health workers’ time. How can we measure quality across the health system efficiently?
Four rows of four icons are shown, each depicting an image related to medical records.
© Nossal Institute for Global Health at the University of Melbourne

One of the challenges of measuring quality care is data availability, as we mentioned earlier this week.

Recently, the Health Data Collaborative at WHO reported that health workers spend 33% of their time in collecting and reporting data. If we are serious about health system improvement ,we need to be aware of the additional burden that data collection and analysis places on our health workforce. Akachi and Kruk in a 2017 article provide a really helpful summary of where and how we can measure quality across the structure, process and outcomes of the health system. Their framework is reproduced here. Notice that structure and outcome measures tend to be easier to measure within usual reporting systems, but measuring the process is much more difficult, and rarely done routinely, yet this is where our understanding of quality will be the richest.

Domains of quality-of-care measurement and data sources

Image source: based on fig. 2 in Akachi, Y. and Kruk, M.E., 2017. Quality of care: measuring a neglected driver of improved health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 95(6), p.465

The six policy recommendations from the authors are:

  1. Improve and institutionalise civil registration and vital statistics systems
  2. Reform facility surveys and strengthen routine information systems
  3. Create new quality of care measures for low-resource contexts
  4. Get the patient perspective on quality
  5. Invest in national measurement of quality of care data
  6. Analyse and present quality of care evidence in ways that produce policy impacts

These six policy areas address structure, process and outcomes, and provide a helpful framework to look at a country’s quality improvement plan.

Can you identify policy responses for each of these six recommendations in your own setting?

References
Akachi, Y & Kruk, ME, 2017, ‘Quality of care: measuring a neglected driver of improved health’, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 95, no. 6, p.465.
Madaj, B, Smith, H, Mathai, M, Roos, N & van den Broek, N, 2017, ‘Developing global indicators for quality of maternal and newborn care: a feasibility assessment’, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 95, no. 6, p.445.
© Nossal Institute for Global Health at the University of Melbourne
This article is from the free online

Health Systems Strengthening

Created by
FutureLearn - Learning For Life

Our purpose is to transform access to education.

We offer a diverse selection of courses from leading universities and cultural institutions from around the world. These are delivered one step at a time, and are accessible on mobile, tablet and desktop, so you can fit learning around your life.

We believe learning should be an enjoyable, social experience, so our courses offer the opportunity to discuss what you’re learning with others as you go, helping you make fresh discoveries and form new ideas.
You can unlock new opportunities with unlimited access to hundreds of online short courses for a year by subscribing to our Unlimited package. Build your knowledge with top universities and organisations.

Learn more about how FutureLearn is transforming access to education