Skip main navigation

Intensities of interaction

From informing to co-production – read how Tobias Buser explains the different degrees of interaction.
Co-production of knowledge – or also co-design or co-creation – is a key characteristic of transdisciplinary research (TDR). Co-production represents an intense degree of interaction, where all involved partners contribute actively to generate new knowledge, debate and design strategies, or craft products and interventions.

However, not every step in a transdisciplinary project is co-production – it is a dynamic sequence of different interaction forms and individual work. For orientation, different degrees of interaction are outlined in this article.

From informing to co-production – different degrees of interaction 1

Degrees of stakeholder interaction describe different modes of stakeholder involvement in research and what roles are attributed to them.

  1. Informing: Lower degrees of stakeholder interaction refer to stages in which stakeholders are mere recipients of knowledge (eg one-way information transfer).

  2. Consultation: Medium degrees refer to stages in which stakeholders are consulted to express their knowledge (eg interview or focus group situations).

  3. Co-production: Higher degrees refer to modes of collaboration in which knowledge is truly co-produced and stakeholders co-shape the research process (eg reciprocal learning between researchers and stakeholders, integration of different perspectives).

These interaction degrees draw on Arnstein’s ‘ladder of participation’2 but have been adapted for knowledge production processes based on Mobjörk3 and Stauffacher et al.4

For an overview on intensities of interaction and an explanation of what this implies for the three stages of TDR, please consult the article ‘Promising degrees of stakeholder interaction in research for sustainable development’.

Dynamic process of interaction in transdisciplinary projects

Not every step in a transdisciplinary project is co-production – it is a dynamic sequence of different interaction forms and individual work. The specific sequence of a project depends on the project goals and context conditions. The following criteria help to indicate if high degrees of interaction, specifically a larger number of co-production opportunities, are promising:

  1. when the project aims to trigger action,
  2. when it aims to produce all three types of knowledge,
  3. when actor diversity is high,
  4. when the issues at stake or the knowledge is contested,
  5. when several actor groups are interested in the issue at stake (otherwise they may not be willing to collaborate), and
  6. when many new relations have to be established.

Diagram depicting the transdisciplinary research process, showing an example of interaction sequence. It shows the intensity with which societal actors are involved in the transdisciplinary research process. The x-axis is labelled from bottom to top with ‘inform’, ‘consult’ and ‘coproduce’. The y-axis shows the three phases of the transdisciplinary research process. From left to right: ‘framing problem’, ‘analysing problem’ and ‘exploring impact’. A dotted curve, starting on the left-hand side on the level of ‘inform’ rises to consult, then to coproduce and back to inform. The wiggly line is just an example illustrating that in each sub-step of a phase and depending of the action of ‘inform’, ‘consult’ or ‘coproduce’ the involvement of the societal actors changes according to their role. The three phases of transdisciplinary research. (Based on Stauffacher et al. (2008), Pohl et al. (2017)) (Click to expand)

Author: Tobias Buser

References

1 Schneider, F. & Buser, T. (2018). Promising degrees of stakeholder interaction in research for sustainable development. Sustainability Science, 13, 129–142.

2 Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35, 216–224.

3 Mobjörk, M. (2010). Consulting versus participatory transdisciplinarity: a refined classification of transdisciplinary research. Futures, 42, 866–873.

4 Stauffacher, M. et al. (2008). Analytic and dynamic approach to collaboration: a transdisciplinary case study on sustainable landscape development in a Swiss prealpine region. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 21, 409–422.

This article is from the free online

Partnering for Change: Link Research to Societal Challenges

Created by
FutureLearn - Learning For Life

Our purpose is to transform access to education.

We offer a diverse selection of courses from leading universities and cultural institutions from around the world. These are delivered one step at a time, and are accessible on mobile, tablet and desktop, so you can fit learning around your life.

We believe learning should be an enjoyable, social experience, so our courses offer the opportunity to discuss what you’re learning with others as you go, helping you make fresh discoveries and form new ideas.
You can unlock new opportunities with unlimited access to hundreds of online short courses for a year by subscribing to our Unlimited package. Build your knowledge with top universities and organisations.

Learn more about how FutureLearn is transforming access to education