Skip main navigation

Get 30% off one whole year of Unlimited learning. Subscribe for just £249.99 £174.99. T&Cs apply

Rubric for writing your plan and reviewing others’ writing

rubric table with criteria and performance level description
Here is a rubric that we would like you to use in the peer review assignment with more information about the assignment to follow

Please refer to your reflections throughout the course, and in particular in steps Summary of week 1, week 2, week 3 and week 4 where we asked you to think about some of the aspects of this assignment. If you had taken some notes then, they can turn into your plan here.

Criteria Performance level description Present/Absent and what to look for:
Context Current situation: Where are you in the world? What’s your current role, and why are you interested in this FL course? Challenges to overcome: What specific patient advocacy challenge are you facing? What is the context? Who or what are you aiming to influence?
Plan/Steps to take Plan: What are 3 – 5 Steps you could take to tackle this challenge (in order of taking them)? This can be based on what you’ve learned here, and any wider ideas if applicable. Who else might need to be involved in those steps, and how?
Successful Outcome Success: What would success look like? Time frame: What is the time frame for your plan?

Your plan should not have more than 600 words, and we propose the following split:

Intro to self – 75 words

Challenge to be overcome – 100 words

Plan (3-5 steps) – 300 words

What success looks like and timetable – 100 words

© Wellcome Sanger Institute
This article is from the free online

The Power of Patient Advocacy in Genomics: Influencing Research, Clinical Practice and Decision Making

Created by
FutureLearn - Learning For Life