Skip main navigation

AI and the judiciary article

Following is the article focus on AI and the judiciary.
Hand and libra icon
© Pixabay License
In this activity, we’ll be talking about “AI and the judiciary.”

Please download and read this article below, and we will discuss this topic via the audio lecture in the following steps.

Abstract Machine learning experts are feeding judicial opinions to algorithms, to predict how future cases will be decided. We call the use of such predictive analytics in judicial contexts a jurisprudence of behaviorism, as it rests on a fundamentally Skinnerian model of cognition as a black boxed transformation of inputs into outputs. In this model, persuasion is passé; what matters is prediction. After describing and critiquing a recent study that has advanced this jurisprudence of behaviorism, we question the value of such research.

Full article

Pasquale, Frank A. and Cashwell, Glyn, Prediction, Persuasion, and the Jurisprudence of Behaviorism (November 8, 2017). U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2017-34, Available at SSRN:

Page 4, 5, 6 are helpful to answer the quiz, and Page 9, 10, 11 are conductive to the final test.

© Frank A. Pasquale, Glyn Cashwell
This article is from the free online

AI for Legal Professionals (I): Law and Policy

Created by
FutureLearn - Learning For Life

Reach your personal and professional goals

Unlock access to hundreds of expert online courses and degrees from top universities and educators to gain accredited qualifications and professional CV-building certificates.

Join over 18 million learners to launch, switch or build upon your career, all at your own pace, across a wide range of topic areas.

Start Learning now