Understanding Problems
So where do you start?
When faced with a particular complex problem most of us feel the urge or pressure to take immediate action to develop and implement a solution. This sometimes is effective; however, more often than not it can lead to ineffective solutions that may create new problems and in some instance may even make the initial problem worse.There are a lot of quotes by a lot of very smart people about problems. For example, the philosopher John Dewey (1938) said:The quote “the greatest challenge to any thinker is stating the problem in a way that will allow a solution” is frequently attributed to Bertrand Russell, and “if I had an hour to solve a problem, I would spend 55 minutes defining the problem and 5 minutes trying to solve it” is often attributed to Einstein. While the likelihood is neither of these men actually said those words, the fact their names are associated with them nevertheless implies the wisdom many think they contain.“A problem well put is half-solved”
Different types of problems
It can be useful to differentiate between different types of problems. Over the course of this week we will look at some ways to make sense of difficult problem situations and describing a problem in such a way that we can begin to develop innovative ways to add value by making the situation better, and avoid unintended consequences.One very common way to start differentiating between problems is thinking about them as ‘tame’ or ‘wicked’.Tame and Wicked Problems
The suggestion that some problems could be considered as ‘tame’ and others as ‘wicked’ originates with two academics working in design and planning, Horst Rittel and Melvin Webber (Rittel and Webber, 1973).Tame problems are those where everyone involved agrees on the gap between what exists and what should exist. There is agreement on what the problem is, what the solution looks like and it is largely clear how it will be achieved.For example if you and your friend want a coffee, but you don’t currently have any, there are proven ways of resolving this problem (make or buy some coffee), and both you and your friend will know when it has been resolved (when you are drinking your coffee). Tame problems are not necessarily trivial problems, and they may even be complicated to solve, but they do have definitive solution and often known methods for achieving them. Constructing a new computer to an agreed specification may be difficult and require particular expertise, but it can be considered tame in that we know what outcome we want and there are proven methods to arrive there.Wicked problems are very different to tame ones. They are wicked in the sense that they are tricky rather than evil or immoral. Rittel and Webber describe these problems as the type where we do not have a known method of developing a strategy and, furthermore, where there is no way of clearly knowing whether they have been solved. Deciding on the route of a new railway line, setting up a sustainable business or reducing societal inequality could be considered wicked problems.Rittel and Webber outlined ten characteristics that make a problem wicked:- There is no definitive formulation of the problem (which means you couldn’t write the problem down in such a way that everyone involved would agree you had captured all the issues and every criteria of success)
- There is no stopping rule (if there is no definitive formulation there is no definitive answer)
- Solutions are good or bad, rather than true or false
- There is no immediate and no ultimate test for a solution
- There is no opportunity for trial-and-error
- There is no way of ensuring all potential solutions have been considered
- Each one is essentially unique
- They can be considered a symptom of another problem
- They can be explained in a number of ways and the choice of explanation will determine the solution
- The problem-solver has no right to be wrong
- Do you think the problem you described in the last step can be described as ‘tame’ or ‘wicked’?
Dewey, J. (1938). ‘The Pattern of Inquiry’ in Logic: Theory of Inquiry, New York: Holt and Company, 101–119
Rittel, H.W.J. and Webber, M. (1973). ‘Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning’, Policy Sciences Vol 4, 155–169
Unleash Your Potential: Innovation and Enterprise

Our purpose is to transform access to education.
We offer a diverse selection of courses from leading universities and cultural institutions from around the world. These are delivered one step at a time, and are accessible on mobile, tablet and desktop, so you can fit learning around your life.
We believe learning should be an enjoyable, social experience, so our courses offer the opportunity to discuss what you’re learning with others as you go, helping you make fresh discoveries and form new ideas.
You can unlock new opportunities with unlimited access to hundreds of online short courses for a year by subscribing to our Unlimited package. Build your knowledge with top universities and organisations.
Learn more about how FutureLearn is transforming access to education