Skip main navigation

£199.99 £139.99 for one year of Unlimited learning. Offer ends on 28 February 2023 at 23:59 (UTC). T&Cs apply

Find out more

Responding to diverse identities

We often form stereotypes about our own cultural groups and other cultural groups based on cultural identities. Stereotypes associated with attitudes
[Steve Kulich] So Ruobing, this week in our course, we’ve talked a lot about cultural identity, but it could be we’ve over-emphasized or over-generalized a few areas. What are some further thoughts that you have for our participants? [CHI Ruobing] Well, I think one important concept is the stereotype. It refers to the over-generalized views towards a group of people who share similar identities. [Steve Kulich] But sometimes it seems like when we first make contact with a new group, we have to start somewhere with some categorizations of how we’re similar or different, so how do we do that in a way that doesn’t become fixed ideas like stereotypes?
[CHI Ruobing] Well, I would admit that it is useful to have stereotypes at the beginning, but if we stick with that and do not look at the individual differences, that will become very dangerous. [Steve Kulich] Yeah, I think that’s what we have to watch out for and, if you notice, a lot of times when we develop jokes or humour, it’s very common to talk about this group or that group, but sometimes those things hurt, and sometimes those have a kind of a prejudiced attitude, don’t they? [CHI Ruobing] Yes. So sometimes we will hear those things about the different genders will have different behavioural intentions, or different age groups will have their preferences.
[Steve Kulich] So we might talk about differences of men and women, and at one level it may be helpful, but not all men or all women are that way, and so if we stick with those ideas, we may actually be forming a kind of judgement . [CHI Ruobing] Yes, and if they stay in the attitudes levels, then those are only just prejudices, but sometimes they will cause even more harm when it comes into the behavioural level, and from that we will call it discrimination. [Steve Kulich] So it’s very important.
We hope that you’ve picked that up in our course, that we do have to categorise, we do have to think about who am I and who are you, but we have to do so in a way that takes into account dynamic culture and the range of cultures and not be fixed. So good starting points, but let’s not get stuck there. [CHI Ruobing] Yeah, that’s true. And actually, for these three concepts– stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination– they’re all related to the distinction between in-groups and out-groups. [Steve Kulich] In-groups and out-groups are actually helpful to get us started, again.
According to Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, it really does help us to have a sense of belonging to a group and having a sense of security and being able to understand how we can communicate more easily because we have common patterns, but the opposite of forming an out-group of another group can cause harm. [CHI Ruobing] That’s true. So we all like to be the in-groups, because when we are the out-groups, we will feel isolated, and we will feel excluded, and sometimes we will be misunderstood. [Steve Kulich] That misunderstanding and this whole issue of prejudice has been a long topic.
Already in the 1950s, Gordon Allport, as a psychologist, was trying to look at how can different groups have contact in ways that’s meaningful and helpful. [CHI Ruobing] So this is called the contact hypothesis, and in this hypothesis Allport has specified under what kind of conditions contact could help us reduce prejudice. [Steve Kulich] We’ve actually prepared a reading for you, as our participants, to examine what does this contact hypothesis mean for you and your intercultural communication, and how can it further a better understanding of our communication across cultures. [CHI Ruobing] And hopefully this reading will help you go beyond this distinction between we and they, in-group and out-group.
We at times use cultural identities to form stereotypes about our own cultural groups and others. Stereotypes influence attitudes which can become prejudice. If we act on such prejudice, it can lead to discrimination.

In focusing on cultural identity, we need to be aware that it can be overemphasized or overgeneralized. These can lead to the following forms and symptoms:

Stereotypes (perceptual level) – our overgeneralized views towards a specific group of people who share similar identities.

Prejudice (attitudinal level) – our preconceived opinions (usually not based on actual experiences or logical reasons) and the related judgments about others.

Discrimination (behavioral level) – our unjust, excluding, biased, or proactively prejudicial treatment of those we relegate to different categories, usually based on perceptions of race, age, sex, or other social or personal lifestyle markers.

For each of these conditions, no matter at what level (and they do often overlap), the maxim “Not Wrong- Just Different” can help us try to understand the cultural logics that may be behind the noticeable differences of certain cultural groups. We need not become absolutely relativistic and accept every behavior under the sun (realizing that even some established cultural patterns might be harmful to some group members), but we should at least try to understand the origins and intentions of those actions. The downloadable article by Kelli McLoud-Schingen, 2015, is helpful for a better understanding of “Prejudice, Bias, Discrimination”. It is also important to think further about our ingroup and outgroup categories, and how Allport’s “Contact Hypothesis might help bridge these relations.

As we noted in the video, categorization is important, but we should seek to do so in a way that takes into account the dynamics and varieties of cultures. Seek to re-evaluate the nature of any of your generalized or fixed ideas about other groups.

We further discuss the importance of these terms:

Ingroups provide what Maslow noted as a basic human need for security and belonging. Relating to our cultural ingroups is usually easier, more comfortable, and gives us senses of regular and predictable patterns, reducing uncertainty.

Outgroups, however normally perceived or formed, can exclude, make us feel more different than we actually are (or exaggerate those differences), create misunderstandings and sometimes even hostilities.

Categorization is important, but we should seek to do so in ways that take into account the dynamics and varieties of cultures. Seek to re-evaluate the nature of any of your generalized or fixed ideas about other groups.

We recommend that you watch “The danger of a single story” 2009 TED Talk by the writer Chimamanda Adichie . Please reflect on when and how you may have let your assumptions or perception of others reduce them to a single but limited story.
This article is from the free online

Intercultural Communication: Dynamics of cultural identities in global interaction

Created by
FutureLearn - Learning For Life

Our purpose is to transform access to education.

We offer a diverse selection of courses from leading universities and cultural institutions from around the world. These are delivered one step at a time, and are accessible on mobile, tablet and desktop, so you can fit learning around your life.

We believe learning should be an enjoyable, social experience, so our courses offer the opportunity to discuss what you’re learning with others as you go, helping you make fresh discoveries and form new ideas.
You can unlock new opportunities with unlimited access to hundreds of online short courses for a year by subscribing to our Unlimited package. Build your knowledge with top universities and organisations.

Learn more about how FutureLearn is transforming access to education